2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00044-016-1567-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural basis of DNA topoisomerase II-α (Top2-α) inhibition: a computational analysis of interactions between Top2-α and its inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several computational techniques such as docking and molecular dynamics simulation were used in this study. These techniques could clearly explain every molecular details from conformational changes during enzyme activity to molecular binding phenomena in an enzyme-ligand system at atomic level 21–26 . We have performed an intensive structural investigation for the understanding of dynamics and conformational motions occurred in LDHA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several computational techniques such as docking and molecular dynamics simulation were used in this study. These techniques could clearly explain every molecular details from conformational changes during enzyme activity to molecular binding phenomena in an enzyme-ligand system at atomic level 21–26 . We have performed an intensive structural investigation for the understanding of dynamics and conformational motions occurred in LDHA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciprofloxacin binds to the catalytic Mg 2+ ion used for re-ligation of DNA via turnover of phosphotyrosine to tyrosine, 48 whereas the mitoxantrone interactions are facilitated by non-covalent contacts unique to TopIIα. 49 This could result in mitoxantrone acting in the bacteria as an intercalator, which would explain the similarity in filament distribution with DNA damaging agents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, it is possible to speculate that the use of methods of CADD modeling could generally be used to optimize numerous known TopoII poisons and catalytic inhibitors into isoform specific agents. For example, Farsani et al employed docking to gain insights into TopoIIβ interactions with mitoxantrone and amsacrine, , where authors identified key residues involved in ligand binding and outlined differences in binding of the two isoforms.…”
Section: The State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%