“…These observations collectively point to an induction of asymmetry within the binding pocket (Figures and ). The binding of 3 to the 6-HB reduced the dynamic mobility of IP 6 and the side chains of residues within SP-1, and the MI did not appear to rotate freely within the binding pocket, an observation that contrasted with the results of a detailed molecular dynamics study. , Further experimentation indicated that the binding of 3 to the Ala 364 Val-resistant virus was attenuated, while the Val 370 Ala mutation reduced the conformational stability of SP-1, presumably allowing for a more facile transition to the conformation that exposes the cleavage site to HIV-1 protease. ,, The deduced binding pose suggests that MIs like 1 and 2 , which introduce larger substituents at C-17 of the core, extend interactions of the molecule with elements of SP-1, including projecting into the region defined by the QVT motif, thereby reducing the mobility of the 6-HB complex in a fashion that prevents access to the conformation recognized by the protease. ,, Some of the mutations that confer resistance to MIs, notably Val 370 , are involved in interstrand interactions that presumably destabilize the 6-HB complex and enhance conformational dynamics, which promotes cleavage site exposure. Collectively, these observations are consistent with the binding dissociation data developed for 1 and 2 in virus-like particles (VLPs) expressing WT and mutated sequences that are compiled in Table .…”