2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37112-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural basis of selective cannabinoid CB2 receptor activation

Abstract: Cannabinoid CB2 receptor (CB2R) agonists are investigated as therapeutic agents in the clinic. However, their molecular mode-of-action is not fully understood. Here, we report the discovery of LEI-102, a CB2R agonist, used in conjunction with three other CBR ligands (APD371, HU308, and CP55,940) to investigate the selective CB2R activation by binding kinetics, site-directed mutagenesis, and cryo-EM studies. We identify key residues for CB2R activation. Highly lipophilic HU308 and the endocannabinoids, but not … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drastic drop in affinity observed toward CB 1 R cannot be fully explained by the CB 2 R and CB 1 R amino acid residue substitutions alone. Thus, we speculate that significant contributions arise from the differences in ligand accessibility to the CB 2 R versus CB 1 R binding sites, as reported for the parent ligand of 1a , HU-308. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The drastic drop in affinity observed toward CB 1 R cannot be fully explained by the CB 2 R and CB 1 R amino acid residue substitutions alone. Thus, we speculate that significant contributions arise from the differences in ligand accessibility to the CB 2 R versus CB 1 R binding sites, as reported for the parent ligand of 1a , HU-308. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, we speculate that significant contributions arise from the differences in ligand accessibility to the CB 2 R versus CB 1 R binding sites, as reported for the parent ligand of 1a, HU-308. 73,74 TR-FRET-Based Assay to Assess Covalent NBD Transfer to CB 2 R. The binding data for 2a−e suggest that conjugation of 1a with the electrophilic O-NBD motif is well tolerated. In previous work on ligand-directed chemistry, covalent labeling was validated by Western blotting, 53 mass spectrometry, 46,75,76 UV−vis spectroscopy, 63 or time-resolved Forster resonance energy transfer (TR-FRET).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] The CB 2 R-G i structure was reported in complex with CB 2 R selective agonist LEI-102 with a resolution 2.9 Å. [9] Considering previous structure activity relationship (SAR) reports [8] , we substituted the thiomorpholine 1,1-dioxide (1) of LEI-121 for a diaziridinepiperidine (2), a difluoropiperidine (3) or a piperidine (4) to investigate their effect on the potency and functionality of the probe. [8] Furthermore, compound 2 was designed to more closely resemble the structure of LEI-102, in an attempt to create an agonist probe.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of probe 2 was similar to the synthesis of LEI-102 (Scheme 2). [9] To start, reductive amination of 4-bromobenzaldehyde and 2-aminoacetamide led to compound 16. After cyclization the formed…”
Section: Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation