Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Basis of Semantic Memory ☆

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But the activation of modal representations seems to participate in language processing more than expected in a system formed by purely amodal symbols (e.g., Binder, Westbury, McKiernan, Possing, & Medler, 2005;Hauk, Johnsrude, & Pulvermüller, 2004;Zwaan & Yaxley, 2003;Nastase & Haxby, 2017;Davis & Yee, 2021;Vergallito, Petilli, Cattaneo, & Marelli, 2019). Thus, there is also a need to formalize an embodiment process to deal with the classical claims of the symbol grounding problem (Harnad, 1990;Searle, 1980), as some amodal representations should be grounded to avoid the Chinese Room Argument (Searle, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But the activation of modal representations seems to participate in language processing more than expected in a system formed by purely amodal symbols (e.g., Binder, Westbury, McKiernan, Possing, & Medler, 2005;Hauk, Johnsrude, & Pulvermüller, 2004;Zwaan & Yaxley, 2003;Nastase & Haxby, 2017;Davis & Yee, 2021;Vergallito, Petilli, Cattaneo, & Marelli, 2019). Thus, there is also a need to formalize an embodiment process to deal with the classical claims of the symbol grounding problem (Harnad, 1990;Searle, 1980), as some amodal representations should be grounded to avoid the Chinese Room Argument (Searle, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies have shown that this is a plausible mechanism for the generation of emotional (Hollis et al., 2017; Martínez‐Huertas et al., 2021) and perceptual (Günther et al., 2020; Günther et al., 2020) responses. Psychobiological evidence has been found for this proposal (Binder, 2016; Nastase & Haxby, 2016) and neural network architectures have been successfully used to computationally model it (Günther et al., 2020; Hoffman et al., 2018; Howell et al., 2005; Martínez‐Huertas et al., 2020, 2021). Neural network models provide a useful framework to predict word emotionality from amodal dimensions because, first, they are valid learning models (Quinlan, 2003) and, second, they learn what the most relevant indicators to predict are, and propagate emotions by activating/inhibiting responses through backpropagation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, semantic relatedness can help facilitate memory in the face of increased interference [11][12][13] and promote integration of to-be-learned materials to later improve memory [14][15][16] . Conversely, episodic learning can selectively reshape pre-existing semantic information, for instance by increasing discriminability of within-category items by expanding representations of to-be-learned information and minimizing those of irrelevant information 17,18 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%