2015
DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.5000176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Behavior of Human Lumbar Intervertebral Disc under Direct Shear

Abstract: This study was an experiment to subject IVDs to direct shear. The results could help us to understand the structure and function of IVDs with regard to mechanical spinal stability, and they can be used to validate finite element models of the IVD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the scalp were assumed based on the experimental data by Galford and McElhaney 21 and the viscous deformation was neglected. The material properties of the cervical discs were based on the test data by Schmidt et al; 22 the effects of the interstitial fluid were neglected. The same elastic material properties were applied to the skull and vertebral bone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the scalp were assumed based on the experimental data by Galford and McElhaney 21 and the viscous deformation was neglected. The material properties of the cervical discs were based on the test data by Schmidt et al; 22 the effects of the interstitial fluid were neglected. The same elastic material properties were applied to the skull and vertebral bone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 reported 565,000 N/m in anterior shear and 366,000 N/m in posterior shear; Schmidt et al. 42 reported 490,000 N/m in the posterior–anterior direction and 110,000 N/m for the disc alone. These reported stiffness values were larger than the values presented in other reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The studies were repeated for the L 3 -L 4 , L 4 -L 5 , and L 5 -S 1 discs, as each has peculiar characteristics. For example, L 5 -S 1 discs have to support a higher shear force than the other two, 36 and the zygapophyseal joint shape and orientation are different for all of them. 37 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%