Structural Change in Corporate Organization

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to assess the adequacy of various economic and sociological explanations in accounting for certain key features of change in large-scale corporations, including vertical integration, product related and unrelated diversification, and the implementation of the multidivisional form. We first review the various economic theories that purport to explain these phenomena, including the structure-conduct-performance perspective, the literature on managerial discretion, transaction cost analysis, contingency theory, and the evolutionary theory of economic change. All of these literatures have efficiency mechanisms that drive their explanations although they work in different ways. We then consider sociological approaches including the literatures in organizational theory on institutionalization and power. Our review of the empirical work provides little support for the economic view of vertical integration and unrelated product diversification, and only modest support for the economic view of product-related diversification and the multidivisional form. The sociological views aid in understanding all of these phenomena to some extent. We conclude by suggesting that the concept of organizational fields may be useful in understanding these structural changes

Challenges and obstacles in sharing and coordinating information during multi-agency disaster response: Propositions from field exercises

“…Often, a distinction is drawn between organizations and institutions, by which organizations are presupposed to reward effectiveness, efficiency and control over production, while institutional environments reward normative requirements of appropriateness and legitimacy and, in some cases, conformity to procedures, presentations, symbols and rhetoric (e.g., Fountain 2001). In this study, we use both theories, which emphasize institutional rules (e.g., routine operational procedures) and relative power among social actors to explain the way organizations respond to changes in the intra/inter/extra-organizational environment, rather than relying solely on market mechanisms and economic rationality (albeit it be bounded) of decision-makers (Fligstein and Dauber 1989).…”

International business and institutional development in Central and Eastern Europe

“…These applications have been made with the goal, implicit or explicit, of overcoming limitations inherent to the rational choice models that dominate economic perspectives on decision-making in organizations (Fligstein & Dauber, 1989).…”

Competition in Multiple Geographic Markets: The Impact on Growth and Market Entry

“…An important aspect of firm behavior that is affected by multimarket contact is the scope of organizational domains: the claims organizations stake out for themselves in terms of the clients they serve, the products they offer, and the technologies they employ (Levine and White, 1961;Thompson, 1967: 25-29). Growth within existing product, technology, or regional markets and entry into new markets are fundamental ways in which organizations redefine their domains and therefore constitute fundamental structural change for corporations (Fligstein and Dauber, 1989). These actions are also directly linked to subsequent multimarket contact: growth in current markets strengthens the interdependence between firms that currently vie for the same clients and resources in multiple markets, while entry into new markets strengthens joint-location ties to current competitors and introduces firms to new competitors.…”