2020
DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2020.1802234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural changes in the Brazilian economy 1990–2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 2000 and 2008, an exchange rate appreciation may have led to an increase in intermediate inputs 11 domestically. This result corroborates the findings in Magacho et al (2018) 12 between 1995-2008and Sousa Filho et al (2020) from 2000-2005and 2010-2015 However, between 2010 and 2014, the imported penetration was more pronounced. Added to the demand deceleration, this also corroborates the loss of importance of the MH&HT group between 2010 and 2014 (see table 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Between 2000 and 2008, an exchange rate appreciation may have led to an increase in intermediate inputs 11 domestically. This result corroborates the findings in Magacho et al (2018) 12 between 1995-2008and Sousa Filho et al (2020) from 2000-2005and 2010-2015 However, between 2010 and 2014, the imported penetration was more pronounced. Added to the demand deceleration, this also corroborates the loss of importance of the MH&HT group between 2010 and 2014 (see table 6).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recent studies by Haraguchi et al (2017) as well as Felipe et al (2019) have questioned whether manufacturing retains its importance in explaining countries' development levels. They conclude that having a more significant 1 For example, Magacho et al (2018), Alves-Passoni (2019) andSousa Filho et al (2020).…”
Section: Mhandht Industries and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This demonstrates that the Brazilian tourism sector has a growth dynamic influenced by final demand, which is a relatively expected result because TCAs, for the most part, target the final demand of the economy. Moreira and Ribeiro (2013) and Sousa Filho et al (2021) using the same methodology, observed a similar behavior for the Brazilian economy. These authors identified that the variation in Brazilian production during the periods of 2000-2005 and 1990-2015, respectively, was mostly explained by changes in the components of final demand.…”
Section: Structural Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Conversely, the expansion of production in sectors primarily oriented toward the domestic market, with potential significant effects on the productive chain, has been significantly hindered by the shifts in final demand, as seen in the cases of Trade and Construction. The findings of Sousa Filho et al (2021) suggest that the Brazilian production structure remains vulnerable and reliant on demand fluctuations for its expansion. Additionally, the manufacturing industry continues to be the primary sector capable of instigating fundamental alterations in production.…”
Section: Structural Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Além disso, o período é marcado pelo crescimento do PIB brasileiro com o "boom das commodities", a geração de empregos formais, a maior distribuição de renda e o crescimento real do salário mínimo (Hoffmann, 2007;Sacchet e Calixtre, 2011;Komatsu e Menezes-Filho, 2015;Spilimbergo e Srinivasan, 2019). No entanto, o ano de 2012 marca o fim do crescimento impulsionado pela demanda e, consequentemente, inicia-se um ciclo de fraco desempenho da economia brasileira impactando os estados e, em particular, a economia do estado da Bahia (Sousa Filho et al, 2020;SEI, 2020). Esses fatores demarcam um período importante na história recente da economia brasileira, da retomada do crescimento aos novos ciclos de recessão.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified