1999
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[1316:scoogm]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Characteristics of Old-Growth, Maturing, and Partially Cut Northern Hardwood Forests

Abstract: Live tree diameter distributions, and abundance and quality of standing and downed coarse woody debris (CWD), were compared among three northern hardwood stand types in the Adirondack Mountains of New York, USA: old growth; partially cut, unevenaged with 40-50 cm maximum residual diameters; and maturing, even-aged, 90-100 yr old, postfire. Downed CWD (stumps Յ1 m tall and logs) volumes in the old-growth, partially cut, and maturing stands were 139, 69, and 61 m 3 /ha, respectively. Large (Ն50 cm diameter) CWD … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
74
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
74
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results indicate that old-growth hemlock forests exhibit a higher degree of structural complexity than second-growth hemlock forests in western Massachusetts, particularly live-tree size distributions and the abundance and decay characteristics of downed coarse woody debris (CWD) and snags. These findings are consistent with other structural comparisons of secondgrowth and old-growth forest ecosystems in northeastern North America (Gore and Patterson 1986, McGee et al 1999, Ziegler 1999, Crow et al 2002 and are likely due to the differences in stand developmental history between the old-growth and second-growth stands. Specifically, the second-growth stands studied originated following stand-replacing disturbances (i.e., clear-cut harvesting) in the late 19th century, whereas the development of the old-growth areas had been primarily FIG.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Successional Stagessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results indicate that old-growth hemlock forests exhibit a higher degree of structural complexity than second-growth hemlock forests in western Massachusetts, particularly live-tree size distributions and the abundance and decay characteristics of downed coarse woody debris (CWD) and snags. These findings are consistent with other structural comparisons of secondgrowth and old-growth forest ecosystems in northeastern North America (Gore and Patterson 1986, McGee et al 1999, Ziegler 1999, Crow et al 2002 and are likely due to the differences in stand developmental history between the old-growth and second-growth stands. Specifically, the second-growth stands studied originated following stand-replacing disturbances (i.e., clear-cut harvesting) in the late 19th century, whereas the development of the old-growth areas had been primarily FIG.…”
Section: Comparisons Between Successional Stagessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The limited attention that these long-term studies have given to structural attributes, such as CWD, leads to uncertainty in our understanding of the linkages between disturbance history and structural components (Kulakowski andVeblen 2003, Fraver 2004). Moreover, while there have been several characterizations of the structural attributes of oldgrowth ecosystems in northeastern North America (e.g., Gore and Patterson 1986, Tyrell and Crow 1994a, McGee et al 1999, Ziegler 2000, little attention has been paid to how variation in disturbance history may affect variation in structural attributes within these systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although total basal area of the overstory was similar between managed and Preserve catchments in this study, tree size and quantities of dead wood were lower at managed sites, accompanied by greater sapling densities (Table 2), which reflect the expected structural characteristics of regenerating forests (Reiners 1992;Gilliam et al 1995;Hardt & Swank 1997;McGee et al 1999;Ziegler 2000;Dieterich et al 2006). The plant species richness of the study catchments is comparable to other regions of the temperate northeastern forest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Both the structure and composition of forest communities can change dramatically during recovery from disturbance, with the roles of individual species changing, the increasing role of overstory vegetation, the decreasing role of the understory in regeneration, and the establishment of shade-tolerant understory plants and standing and fallen dead wood pools. The total basal area of trees in a stand tends to increase with stand age, while overall density tends to decrease as individual stems get larger (Gilliam et al 1995;Liptzin & Ashton 1999;McGee et al 1999;Ziegler 2000;Niklas et al 2003). Sapling density and productivity are greater during the early regenerating stages of a stand, and decline as overstory trees become established (Reiners 1992;Gilliam et al 1995;Ziegler 2000;Dieterich et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation