2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.07.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural characterization of InAlAsSb/InGaAs/InP heterostructures for solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baladés et al . () did not find significant intensity fluctuations in the atomic columns faraway from those found in the InP substrate. The authors attribute this to a possible averaging of 3D small composition fluctuations through the foil thickness in specimens prepared following the classical procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baladés et al . () did not find significant intensity fluctuations in the atomic columns faraway from those found in the InP substrate. The authors attribute this to a possible averaging of 3D small composition fluctuations through the foil thickness in specimens prepared following the classical procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…, ; Baladés et al. , ). Each model is considered as a continuous supercell of 23 × 17 unit cells, with dimensions 10 × 10 nm along [110] and [001] axis, respectively.…”
Section: Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, micrographs taken in [220] bright field conditions depicted the existence of strain fluctuations in the buffer layer, related to compositional modulation for all studied growth conditions. Aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) 5 studies showed the possibility of short range compositional fluctuation in quaternary layers [4]. Non-random growth in InAlAsSb heterostructures lattice-matched to InAs has been reported previously [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…III-V multijunction solar cells have held record efficiency for the past few decades, with a current highest value of 46% for a mechanically stacked 4 junction (4J) 3 device under concentrated terrestrial sunlight [1]. When grown monolithically, the record efficiency is 45.7%, also for a 4 J inverted metamorphic (IMM) 4 III-V solar cell grown on GaAs substrates [1]. In this method, some of the layers are grown under mismatch conditions to better match the ideal bandgap for solar energy conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, the InAlAsSb grown lattice-matched to InP exhibited narrower bandgaps than those predicted, with photoluminescence indicating the presence of both type II band alignment and carrier confinement. While secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed that the bulk composition and lattice-matching were within measurement error of the target values [1], [2], transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and atom probe tomography (APT) indicated the existence of cluster features most likely on a scale of tens of angstroms [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%