2003
DOI: 10.1021/cm0204728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Characterization of Layered LixNi0.5Mn0.5O2 (0 < x ≤ 2) Oxide Electrodes for Li Batteries

Abstract: X-ray diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy experiments were used to study chemical and electrochemical Li insertion and extraction reactions of LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2. These results, along with galvanostatic cycling data, suggest that LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2 layered electrodes in lithium batteries operate predominantly off two-electron redox couples, Ni4+/Ni2+, between approximately 4.5 and 1.25 V and Mn4+/Mn2+ between 1.25 and 1.0 V versus metallic Li, respectively. The retention of a stable layered framework structu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
102
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
10
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8a and b), which may be an indicator of two-phase coexistence along the low-voltage plateau. However, the overlithiated ''Li 2 MO 2 '' phase, which has a space group of P-3m1 and shows a (001) peak at *17°2h CuKa [11][12][13], was not detected in the diffraction patterns obtained in the low-voltage region (not shown), probably because the volumetric fraction of the ''Li 2 MO 2 '' phase on the particle surface was below the XRD detection limit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8a and b), which may be an indicator of two-phase coexistence along the low-voltage plateau. However, the overlithiated ''Li 2 MO 2 '' phase, which has a space group of P-3m1 and shows a (001) peak at *17°2h CuKa [11][12][13], was not detected in the diffraction patterns obtained in the low-voltage region (not shown), probably because the volumetric fraction of the ''Li 2 MO 2 '' phase on the particle surface was below the XRD detection limit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the slow rate of lithium-ion diffusion in the layered structure compared to the lithium insertion rate during discharge, the lithium concentration increases significantly near the particle surface, which eventually induces formation of an overlithiated ''Li 2 MO 2 '' (Li 2 MO 2 or Li 2 MO 2 -like) phase on the oxide particle surface [5,8]. The Li 2 MO 2 phase has been observed for M = Ni [11] and M = Ni 0.5 Mn 0.5 [12] from heavily overlithiated LiNiO 2 and LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 , respectively, in lithium cells and for M = Mn [13] by chemical lithiation of LiMn 2 O 4 with n-butyl lithium. Therefore, the sudden voltage drop near the end of discharge (starting at *3.6 V in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to increase the storage capacity in lithium batteries is to get more than one electron per transition metal redox center. Several materials, including VSe 2 , 13 VOPO 4 , 14 and Li x Ni 0.5 Mn 0.5 O 2 , 15 can achieve close to two electrons, as shown in Figure 4. However, in each of these cases, there is a large difference between the potential of the first reduction and that of the second reduction, which will prevent both steps from being used in a practical battery.…”
Section: The Cathodementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the latter hypothesis were correct, it should be possible to recover the full capacity of NMC, if the discharge is not terminated by a voltage limit but continued at constant voltage to compensate for the slow lithium ion diffusion. The results of such an approach are shown in Figure 6: after an initial charge and discharge cycle at 0.1C in the in situ XRD half-cell, the potential was first held at 3.0 V for 12 h, then at 2.0 V for 10 h, and finally at 1.6 V for 8 h. Note that the potential is kept well above 1.5 V to prevent the formation of the overlithiated "Li 2 MO 2 " on the particle surface which would result in a two-phase coexistence and two different Li diffusion processes; 38,39 its absence is evidenced in Figure 6c, as the associated additional peak at ∼8• 2θ Mo,Kα 41,42 left to the (0 0 3) peak is not appearing. Holding the potential at 3.0 V for 12 hours results in a ∼50% recuperation of the ICL (marked by the gray area in Figure 6a), concomitant with a close approach of the c/a value toward its initial value (second-to the left black vs. red symbol in Figure 6b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• 2θ Mo,Kα 41,42 left to the (0 0 3) peak is not appearing. Holding the potential at 3.0 V for 12 hours results in a ∼50% recuperation of the ICL (marked by the gray area in Figure 6a), concomitant with a close approach of the c/a value toward its initial value (second-to the left black vs. red symbol in Figure 6b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%