2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2011.01.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Comparison of the Finger Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Surfaces and Those of the Third Toe: Suitability for Joint Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the changes in ligament length are small, these represent relatively large changes, ranging from 6.8% to 16.6%, as the PIP joint flexes. In addition, given the size of the PIP joint, the radius of curvature for the condylar heads of the proximal phalanx is also small, ranging from 4.02 mm to 4.16 mm (Hendry et al 2011) and 3.8 mm to 4.2 mm (Hernandez and Sommerkamp, 2010). The structure of the PIP joint gives an arc of motion of approximately 90° to 100° of flexion (Houshian et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the changes in ligament length are small, these represent relatively large changes, ranging from 6.8% to 16.6%, as the PIP joint flexes. In addition, given the size of the PIP joint, the radius of curvature for the condylar heads of the proximal phalanx is also small, ranging from 4.02 mm to 4.16 mm (Hendry et al 2011) and 3.8 mm to 4.2 mm (Hernandez and Sommerkamp, 2010). The structure of the PIP joint gives an arc of motion of approximately 90° to 100° of flexion (Houshian et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%