2023
DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2023.2164903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural competency in epidemiological research: What’s feasible, what’s tricky, and the benefits of a ‘structural turn’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings also suggest a role for a structural competency approach to training across health-related disciplines and practices ( 95 ). Originally conceived to train medical students to better understand and address how structural inequities show up in the clinic, structural competency has been reformulated into a set of guidelines and practices for epidemiologists to introduce epistemic humility into the research process and address paradigmatic challenges of a ‘structural turn’ within the field ( 96 ). Although they do not directly address issues specific to disability and ableism, some social epidemiologists have been advocating for alternatives to positivist epistemological frameworks in the field ( 97 ) to provide a foundation for using qualitative methodologies that can inform deeper and richer explanations of social and health phenomena.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings also suggest a role for a structural competency approach to training across health-related disciplines and practices ( 95 ). Originally conceived to train medical students to better understand and address how structural inequities show up in the clinic, structural competency has been reformulated into a set of guidelines and practices for epidemiologists to introduce epistemic humility into the research process and address paradigmatic challenges of a ‘structural turn’ within the field ( 96 ). Although they do not directly address issues specific to disability and ableism, some social epidemiologists have been advocating for alternatives to positivist epistemological frameworks in the field ( 97 ) to provide a foundation for using qualitative methodologies that can inform deeper and richer explanations of social and health phenomena.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%