Microaerophilic, neutrophilic, iron-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB) grow via the oxidation of reduced Fe(II) at or near neutral pH, in the presence of oxygen, making them relevant in numerous environments with elevated Fe(II) concentrations. However, the biochemical mechanisms for Fe(II) oxidation by these neutrophilic FeOB are unknown, and genetic markers for this process are unavailable. In the ocean, microaerophilic microorganisms in the genus Mariprofundus of the class Zetaproteobacteria are the only organisms known to chemolithoautotrophically oxidize Fe and concurrently biomineralize it in the form of twisted stalks of iron oxyhydroxides. The aim of this study was to identify highly expressed proteins associated with the electron transport chain of microaerophilic, neutrophilic FeOB. To this end, Mariprofundus ferrooxydans PV-1 was cultivated, and its proteins were extracted, assayed for redox activity, and analyzed via liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for identification of peptides. The results indicate that a cytochrome c 4 , cbb 3 -type cytochrome oxidase subunits, and an outer membrane cytochrome c were among the most highly expressed proteins and suggest an involvement in the process of aerobic, neutrophilic bacterial Fe oxidation. Proteins associated with alternative complex III, phosphate transport, carbon fixation, and biofilm formation were abundant, consistent with the lifestyle of Mariprofundus.
Iron (Fe) is one of the most abundant elements on Earth and a major component of the oceanic crust (1). The biologically catalyzed oxidation of Fe at circumneutral pH with oxygen (O 2 ) as the terminal electron acceptor has remained largely enigmatic, even though neutrophilic Fe oxidation is among the first chemoautotrophic microbial metabolisms described in the literature (2). This lack of data is due, in part, to obstacles such as culturing of fastidious microaerophilic, neutrophilic, Fe-oxidizing bacteria (FeOB); the relatively low cell densities in cultures; and the interference of Fe oxides with sample preparation. In addition to this, aerobic, neutrophilic FeOB have so far been elusive to genetic manipulation. Consequently, these challenges have impeded the ability to understand the mechanisms of neutrophilic Fe oxidation in the presence of O 2 and inhibited the development of molecular diagnostics targeting genetic markers for such a biological function (i.e., molecular probes targeting genes, transcripts, or proteins indicative of activity). Recent genomic analyses of microaerophilic, neutrophilic FeOB (3-6) have suggested genes that might be involved in Fe oxidation; however, evidence of expression of these genes in FeOB has not been shown. This is in contrast with the recent advancements in the elucidation of the mechanisms of Fe oxidation in aerobic, acidophilic bacteria (especially Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Leptospirillum spp.) and neutrophilic, anoxygenic, phototrophic bacteria (Rhodopseudomonas palustris and Rhodobacter spp.) (see reference 7 for a review).Mariprofundus fer...