2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10870-010-9722-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Conformation of a Novel Piperidine-4-One Derivative: 1-Acryloyl-3-Methyl-2,6-Dip-Tolylpiperidine-4-One

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), the cyclohexenone ring (C1-C6) is puckered [maximum puckering amplitude Q = 0.554 (4) (3) A ˚and exhibits an envelope conformation on atom C2 (Cremer & Pople, 1975). The bond lengths and bond angles agree with those of previously reported related compounds (Gunasekaran et al, 2009;Mertsalov et al, 2021;Chandana et al, 2021;Ganesha, Nizamuddin et al, 2023;Ganesha et al, 2022;Sreenatha et al, 2018Sreenatha et al, , 2020Sreenatha et al, , 2022Lakshminarayana et al, 2009Lakshminarayana et al, , 2010Lakshminarayana et al, , 2022Madan Kumar et al, 2018;HariPrasada et al, 2023). The dihedral angle between the mean plane of the cyclohexenone (C1-C6) and fluorobenzene rings (C7-C12 and C17-C22) are 62.3 (2) and 84.9 ( 2…”
Section: Structural Commentarysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1), the cyclohexenone ring (C1-C6) is puckered [maximum puckering amplitude Q = 0.554 (4) (3) A ˚and exhibits an envelope conformation on atom C2 (Cremer & Pople, 1975). The bond lengths and bond angles agree with those of previously reported related compounds (Gunasekaran et al, 2009;Mertsalov et al, 2021;Chandana et al, 2021;Ganesha, Nizamuddin et al, 2023;Ganesha et al, 2022;Sreenatha et al, 2018Sreenatha et al, , 2020Sreenatha et al, , 2022Lakshminarayana et al, 2009Lakshminarayana et al, , 2010Lakshminarayana et al, , 2022Madan Kumar et al, 2018;HariPrasada et al, 2023). The dihedral angle between the mean plane of the cyclohexenone (C1-C6) and fluorobenzene rings (C7-C12 and C17-C22) are 62.3 (2) and 84.9 ( 2…”
Section: Structural Commentarysupporting
confidence: 86%