2013
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767312047150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural constraints on the three-dimensional geometry of simple viruses: case studies of a new predictive tool

Abstract: Understanding the fundamental principles of virus architecture is one of the most important challenges in biology and medicine. Crick and Watson were the first to propose that viruses exhibit symmetry in the organization of their protein containers for reasons of genetic economy. Based on this, Caspar and Klug introduced quasi-equivalence theory to predict the relative locations of the coat proteins within these containers and classified virus structure in terms of T-numbers. Here it is shown that quasi-equiva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
88
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for this choice of polyhedral shapes, called start configurations in Keef & Twarock (2009), stems from the fact that they correspond to the projections of the standard bases of the three Bravaislattice types with icosahedral symmetry in six dimensions: the icosahedron obtained from a six-dimensional simple cubic lattice, the dodecahedron from a six-dimensional bodycentred cubic lattice and the icosidodecahedron from a sixdimensional face-centred cubic lattice. In particular, the use of these shapes in the construction of the affine groups ensures that the point arrays are subsets of the vertex sets of quasilattices with icosahedral symmetry [see Keef et al (2013) for a two-dimensional example and Salthouse (2013) for a threedimensional one]. In particular, this implies that the affineextended non-crystallographic groups are by construction related to aperiodic tilings, in analogy to the relation between affine-extended crystallographic groups and lattices.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The reason for this choice of polyhedral shapes, called start configurations in Keef & Twarock (2009), stems from the fact that they correspond to the projections of the standard bases of the three Bravaislattice types with icosahedral symmetry in six dimensions: the icosahedron obtained from a six-dimensional simple cubic lattice, the dodecahedron from a six-dimensional bodycentred cubic lattice and the icosidodecahedron from a sixdimensional face-centred cubic lattice. In particular, the use of these shapes in the construction of the affine groups ensures that the point arrays are subsets of the vertex sets of quasilattices with icosahedral symmetry [see Keef et al (2013) for a two-dimensional example and Salthouse (2013) for a threedimensional one]. In particular, this implies that the affineextended non-crystallographic groups are by construction related to aperiodic tilings, in analogy to the relation between affine-extended crystallographic groups and lattices.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full classification of the affine extensions of the icosahedral group based on the three polyhedral start configurations given by the icosahedron, dodecahedron and icosidodecahedron has been provided in Keef & Twarock (2009), and applications of these point arrays to viruses have been discussed in Keef et al (2013). In particular, since the relative scalings between all the points in the array are fixed by the extended group, there is only one global scaling factor that maps all points collectively onto the biological system.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations