2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11432-016-0498-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural controllability of multi-agent systems with absolute protocol under fixed and switching topologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One line of research deals with the structural controllability of composite systems [22]- [26]. Current interest stems from the realization that structural controllability is a key property of interest in swarming behavior and in the modeling and understanding complex networks [27]- [35]. For example, identification, characterization, and classification of driver vertices or steering vertices in biomedical networks [36]- [43], which tend This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant n. 1607101.00 and US Air Force grant n. FA9550-16-1-0290.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One line of research deals with the structural controllability of composite systems [22]- [26]. Current interest stems from the realization that structural controllability is a key property of interest in swarming behavior and in the modeling and understanding complex networks [27]- [35]. For example, identification, characterization, and classification of driver vertices or steering vertices in biomedical networks [36]- [43], which tend This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant n. 1607101.00 and US Air Force grant n. FA9550-16-1-0290.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The definition of structural controllability was firstly proposed in the work of Lin and then generalized to MASs in the work of Zamani and Lin, where topological condition for a single‐leader system was investigated, and a necessary and sufficient graph‐theoretic condition on structural controllability was proposed. Subsequently, structural (strongly structurally) controllability of MAS has been studied extensively in various ways, and corresponding results include constrained matching, zero forcing set, absolute protocol, and switching topology …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, structural (strongly structurally) controllability of MAS has been studied extensively in various ways, and corresponding results include constrained matching, zero forcing set, absolute protocol, and switching topology. [29][30][31][32][33] It is noteworthy that the aforementioned results for MAS controllability involve the entire set of agents. However, in practical scenarios, many MASs are massive in size, structure, and complexity, hence it is difficult and unnecessary to completely control the whole systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially, tree graph was studied in , and necessary and sufficient conditions were proposed in terms of downer branch and subgraphs to characterize controllability. In addition, there are some other relevant results, for example, results on controllability were derived with respect to protocols design , heterogeneous dynamics , identification of topology structures , switching topology , time‐delay and structural controllability , and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most aforementioned results (except structural controllability e.g., , and so on) were concerned with controllability under undirected interaction topology, where information transmission and exchange among the agents are bidirectional and symmetrical. However, in practice, the underlying topology may be directional in most cases because of the interaction patterns, environment disturbances, the performance differences among agents, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%