2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2019.228302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural controls on Jurassic gold mineralization, and Cretaceous-Tertiary exhumation in the foreland of the southern Patagonian Andes: New constraints from La Paloma area, Deseado Massif, Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(74 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, few AHe ages from local areas of the northern Patagonian Broken Foreland record younger Neogene ages and have been related to the close and coeval intraplate volcanic activity (Savignano et al, 2016;Genge et al, 2021), as we suppose it is the case along the San Bernardo FTB. We thus conclude that, as previously proposed for other parts of the Patagonian Broken Foreland (Savignano et al, 2016;Fernández et al, 2020;Genge et al, 2021), the main deformation of the southern San Bernardo FTB occurred from the Cretaceous to the early Paleogene, while the middle-late Miocene deformation was modest (Figure 6C), especially in terms of vertical displacements.…”
Section: The Miocene Deformation Phasesupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, few AHe ages from local areas of the northern Patagonian Broken Foreland record younger Neogene ages and have been related to the close and coeval intraplate volcanic activity (Savignano et al, 2016;Genge et al, 2021), as we suppose it is the case along the San Bernardo FTB. We thus conclude that, as previously proposed for other parts of the Patagonian Broken Foreland (Savignano et al, 2016;Fernández et al, 2020;Genge et al, 2021), the main deformation of the southern San Bernardo FTB occurred from the Cretaceous to the early Paleogene, while the middle-late Miocene deformation was modest (Figure 6C), especially in terms of vertical displacements.…”
Section: The Miocene Deformation Phasesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Gianni et al, 2017), which, according to Maloney et al (2013), could be related to the change of convergence of the Nazca plate. This deformation event was also evidenced in the northern (Gastre Basin;Bilmes et al, 2013) and the southern Patagonian Broken Foreland (Deseado Massif; Giacosa et al, 2010), although lowtemperature in-situ thermochronology studies in these areas suggest minor vertical displacements during the Neogene as they evidence a lack of thermochronology signal since the Paleogene (Savignano et al, 2016;Fernández et al, 2020;Genge et al, 2021). Indeed, the latter thermochronology data and associated thermal modeling characterize a slow cooling of the whole foreland since the Late Cretaceous, with the lack of any particular thermal event.…”
Section: The Miocene Deformation Phasementioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multi-scale structural analysis of Au-Ag mineralization in veins shows that the distribution of the districts is regionally controlled by normal to oblique slip fault system, in response to the NE-SW extensional direction (Jovic et al, 2014;Fernández et al, 2019). However, each district shows local controls dependent on its own geological, lithological and structural characteristics (Jovic et al, 2014).…”
Section: Structural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial Aptian‐Cenomanian contractional deformation in the SPA was suggested by forced regressions in the foreland basin (Ghiglione et al., 2015) and angular unconformities separating Cretaceous from younger rocks (Aramendía et al., 2018; Ronda et al., 2019). However, the regional distribution of Cretaceous low‐temperature thermochronometric ages is insufficient to backup a direct relation between cooling and shortening (Fernández et al., 2020; Fosdick et al., 2013). Within the studied area (Figure 1) existing Cretaceous zircon (U‐Th)/He and zircon fission tracks data have been linked to cooling following crystallization (Andrić‐Tomašević et al., 2021; Thomson et al., 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%