2017
DOI: 10.1080/17415977.2017.1310855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural damage identification based on modified Artificial Bee Colony algorithm using modal data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Before applying the proposed ALO-INM algorithm to the SDD problem, the computing performance of the ALO-INM algorithm should be tested and compared with the original ALO algorithm. In order to focus on assessing the local optimization ability of two algorithms, three classical mathematical benchmark functions (Ding et al, 2018; Pan et al, 2016; Yu and Li, 2014), that is, Sphere, Ackley, and composite Griewank as listed in Table 1, are employed for calculation. Among them, Sphere is a unimodal benchmark function, and Ackley is a multimodal benchmark function, while composite Griewank is a composite benchmark function.…”
Section: Methodologies Of Alo-inm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before applying the proposed ALO-INM algorithm to the SDD problem, the computing performance of the ALO-INM algorithm should be tested and compared with the original ALO algorithm. In order to focus on assessing the local optimization ability of two algorithms, three classical mathematical benchmark functions (Ding et al, 2018; Pan et al, 2016; Yu and Li, 2014), that is, Sphere, Ackley, and composite Griewank as listed in Table 1, are employed for calculation. Among them, Sphere is a unimodal benchmark function, and Ackley is a multimodal benchmark function, while composite Griewank is a composite benchmark function.…”
Section: Methodologies Of Alo-inm Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before applying the proposed ALO-INM algorithm to the SDD problem, the computing performance of the ALO-INM algorithm should be tested and compared with the original ALO algorithm. In order to focus on assessing the local optimization ability of two algorithms, three classical mathematical benchmark functions (Ding et al, 2018;Pan et al, 2016;Yu and Li, 2014), that is, Sphere, Ackley, and composite Griewank as listed in Each benchmark function is calculated 10 times, then two indices including convergence accuracy and computational efficiency are employed to assess and to compare the computing performance of two algorithms. Particularly, apart from parameters of the INM algorithm, the parameter setting for the ALO-INM algorithm is the same as the ones for the original ALO algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Assessment Of Alo-inm Algorithm Using Benchmark mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding the damage in a pipe structure using the eigensolution can be transformed into a complex optimization problem [32,33]. In recent years, iterative techniques based on the swarm intelligence have attracted considerable attention from researchers for solving complicated optimization problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm has been modified to increase the convergence speed many times for constrained and real-parameter optimization problems [4][5]. In recent years, the ABC algorithm has been successfully implemented in civil engineering optimization problems such as optimum design of braced steel frame [6], pavement resurfacing problem [7], the structural damage detection problem [8], evaluation of the compressive strength of concrete specimens using laboratory experiments [9], optimization of the cost of project schedules in construction [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%