2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural damage identification using improved Jaya algorithm based on sparse regularization and Bayesian inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiming to this hardship, Bayesian theory has been introduced in the field of SHM. For example, Ding et al [15] adopted Bayesian inference and sparse regularization technology to modify the traditional objective function of damage identification; the numerical example and experimental studies show that the robustness is enhanced under the condition of significant uncertainty effect. Hou et al [16] developed the spare Bayesian learning framework to simultaneously consider the uncertainties and varying temperature conditions; an experimental frame study demonstrated that the method is effective in locating and quantifying structural damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aiming to this hardship, Bayesian theory has been introduced in the field of SHM. For example, Ding et al [15] adopted Bayesian inference and sparse regularization technology to modify the traditional objective function of damage identification; the numerical example and experimental studies show that the robustness is enhanced under the condition of significant uncertainty effect. Hou et al [16] developed the spare Bayesian learning framework to simultaneously consider the uncertainties and varying temperature conditions; an experimental frame study demonstrated that the method is effective in locating and quantifying structural damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ding et al adopted tree seeds algorithm to identify structural damages with uncertainties based on frequency domain data. Later, Ding et al used Jaya algorithm to conduct damage identification, in which the objective function is modified by using sparse regularization technique and Bayesian inference. Kang et al proposed an improved particle swarm optimizer to identify structural parameters with and without considering noise contamination in the measurement data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, GA tends to be trapped into local optimal, which causes the low inaccuracy of damage identification. Aiming to these drawbacks, some other optimization tools, such as Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) [ 18 ], Cuckoo Search (CS) [ 19 ], Jaya algorithm [ 20 ], Artificial Fish Swarm Optimization (AFSWO) [ 21 ], and Artificial Bee Colony algorithm [ 22 ], were adopted in previous studies as well. Furthermore, based on the hybrid mechanism of different algorithms, better optimization performance can be achieved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%