2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural damage localization by combining flexibility and stiffness methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the numerical and experimental examples of their method showed that it can estimate the damage location and condition using the first few modes only. In fact these examples demonstrated that the modal flexibility method which employs both natural frequencies and mode shapes is more sensitive to damage than other methods based on natural frequencies or mode shapes alone [15,16].…”
Section: Review Of Damage Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results of the numerical and experimental examples of their method showed that it can estimate the damage location and condition using the first few modes only. In fact these examples demonstrated that the modal flexibility method which employs both natural frequencies and mode shapes is more sensitive to damage than other methods based on natural frequencies or mode shapes alone [15,16].…”
Section: Review Of Damage Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Stutz et al present a flexibility-based continuum damage identification approach [23]. Yan and Golinval studied a damage localization method by combining flexibility and stiffness methods [24]. Yang and Liu defined a damage localization criterion to locate structural damage, which makes use of the change of flexibility matrix and the stiffness matrix of the intact structure [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonmodel-based methods detect damage through vibrational signals directly without use of a structural model. The non-model-based methods mainly include methods based on the change in natural frequency (Lee and Chung, 2000;Kim et al, 2003), the change of structural vibration mode (Khoo et al, 2004), the change of structural flexibility or stiffness (Yan and Golinval, 2005), the transfer function (Park and Park, 2005), the statistic information (Iwasaki et al, 2004;López-Díez et al, 2005;Garcia-Perez et al, 2013), the power flow (Li et al, 2004), and so on. The model-based methods detect damage based on predetermined structural models, in which the model updating methods are widely used (Sinha and Friswell, 2003;Sadr et al, 2007;Zhao et al, 2009;Lei et al, 2012;Liu and Duan, 2012;Erdogan and Bakir, 2013;Liu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%