2022
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2101039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Determinants in the Staphylococcus aureus–Derived Phenol-Soluble Modulin α2 Peptide Required for Neutrophil Formyl Peptide Receptor Activation

Abstract: Highly pathogenic Staphylococcus aureus strains produce phenol-soluble modulins (PSMs), which are N-formylated peptides. Nanomolar concentrations of PSMα2 are recognized by formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2), but unlike the prototypic FPR2 agonist WKYMVM, PSMα2 is a biased signaling agonist. The truncated N-terminal PSMα2 variant, consisting of the five N-terminal residues, is no longer recognized by FPR2, showing that the C-terminal part of PSMα2 confers FPR2 selectivity, whereas the N-terminal part may interac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two receptors have different recognition profiles, and it seems that FPR1 preferentially interacts with shorter peptides whereas FPR2 exhibits a preference for longer peptides. Data obtained with chimeric fMIFL‐PSMα2 peptides show that even though longer formyl peptides often possess FPR2 selectivity, this does not exclude recognition by FPR1 51 . Clearly, recognition of formyl peptides by both FPRs is not determined solely by the N‐terminal 4–5 amino acids, suggested to fit directly into the binding pocket.…”
Section: Defined Neutrophil Gpcrsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The two receptors have different recognition profiles, and it seems that FPR1 preferentially interacts with shorter peptides whereas FPR2 exhibits a preference for longer peptides. Data obtained with chimeric fMIFL‐PSMα2 peptides show that even though longer formyl peptides often possess FPR2 selectivity, this does not exclude recognition by FPR1 51 . Clearly, recognition of formyl peptides by both FPRs is not determined solely by the N‐terminal 4–5 amino acids, suggested to fit directly into the binding pocket.…”
Section: Defined Neutrophil Gpcrsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Data obtained with chimeric fMIFL-PSMα2 peptides show that even though longer formyl peptides often possess FPR2 selectivity, this does not exclude recognition by FPR1. 51 Clearly, recognition of formyl peptides by both FPRs is not determined solely by the Nterminal 4-5 amino acids, suggested to fit directly into the binding pocket. The importance of the C-terminal part in conferring FPR subtype selectivity is in fact supported by studies showing that a peptide in which the hydrophobic Ile 11 positioned close to the C terminus of a dual FPR agonist was removed (or replaced with Ala), no longer was recognized by FPR2, whereas its ability to be recognized by FPR1 was retained.…”
Section: Recognition Of Peptides Originating From Mitochondria and St...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations