1999
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural differences in d and l -monellin in the crystals of racemic mixture 1 1Edited by D. C. Rees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The available set of racemic and quasiracemic protein crystal structures allows 14 comparisons with chiral crystal counterparts (8, 29, 32, 33, 35-39, 42, 43), and all seem to suggest that native tertiary structure is maintained. Only three racemate structures include specific native-like quaternary contacts (8,32,41). In one of these systems (32), native-like quaternary contacts are maintained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The available set of racemic and quasiracemic protein crystal structures allows 14 comparisons with chiral crystal counterparts (8, 29, 32, 33, 35-39, 42, 43), and all seem to suggest that native tertiary structure is maintained. Only three racemate structures include specific native-like quaternary contacts (8,32,41). In one of these systems (32), native-like quaternary contacts are maintained.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wondered whether this tetrameric assembly would be maintained under the conditions of racemic crystallization, a technique first implemented by Zawadzke and Berg (29) that has become increasingly popular in recent years (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44). It has been proposed that racemates are more prone to crystallization than single enantiomers because racemates can access achiral and centrosymmetric packing arrangements in the solid state (45), arrangements that are not available to a chiral entity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although high-throughput robotics now makes it possible to screen vast numbers of crystallization conditions, some proteins remain recalcitrant to crystallization. Many approaches have been developed to improve the success rate for crystallization, for example, systematically truncating the target protein, 1,2 methylating the lysine residues, 3,4 removing post-translational modifications, [5][6][7] screening homologues of the target protein for crystallization, 8,9 fusing the target protein to a carrier protein, [10][11][12][13] crystallizing racemic mixtures of the target protein, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and cocrystallizing the target protein with antibodies or other binding proteins. [21][22][23] A number of those methods have been reviewed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 It was also predicted that for racemic protein crystals, the space group, P1, would be the one most frequently observed 17 ; crystallographic experiments by us and by others have so far confirmed this prediction. 2,4,8,[18][19][20] The present study adds another example of a racemic protein crystal that is not in P1 but in another space group, P2 1 /c. 3 The number of proteins that have been crystallized in racemic form is still small, so an accurate statistical analysis of space groups is not possible yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%