2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural-electrical-optical properties relationship of sodium superionic conductor sputter-deposited coatings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6, see the conductivity drop during the first heating cycle). The less pronounced diffusion wing [17] resulting from this event is consistent with a higher local order of the amorphous phase. After this reorganisation, the room temperature ionic conductivity raised from~3.10 −5 S cm −1 up to~2.10 -3 S cm −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6, see the conductivity drop during the first heating cycle). The less pronounced diffusion wing [17] resulting from this event is consistent with a higher local order of the amorphous phase. After this reorganisation, the room temperature ionic conductivity raised from~3.10 −5 S cm −1 up to~2.10 -3 S cm −1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…5b) and homogeneity of the deposited films were observed thanks to high-frequency pulsed DC sputtering (200 to 350 kHz) of the Na 3 PO 4 target [15,16]. As deposited films are amorphous and reorganise after air annealing near 300°C before a crystallisation under a NASICON phase near 700°C [15][16][17]. The ionic conductivity seems to be influenced by the structural reorganisation in the glassy state (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…While there have been many studies concerning the preparation and properties of bulk ceramics of NaSICon (see for example references 8 and 9 and references therein), to date there have been limited studies on the preparation of thin films of NaSICon. Deposition methods that have been explored include chemical solution deposition, [10][11][12][13] sputtering, [14][15][16] E-beam evaporation, 16 and pulsed-laser ablation. 17 Of these reports, few have rigorously demonstrated correct phase assignment and clean evidence of sodium ion conduction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also noticeable that the determined D values for Na + cation (10 −11 to 10 −12 cm².s −1 ) are close to those reported for Li + (10 −9 to 10 −12 cm 2 .s −1 ) [24,54,55,27] or also K + (10 −11 cm 2 .s −1 ) [19], in the same WO 3 matrix. For the case C, the conductivity of the amorphous NASICON layer was evaluated to be close to 3.10 −5 S.cm −1 [35]. D values for crystalline NASICON of 2.10 −3 S.cm −1 were evaluated to 5.10 −10 cm 2 .s −1 [56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…300 nm was deposited on WO 3 using Zr-Si and Na 3 PO 4 target following the procedure described in Refs. [34,35].…”
Section: Preparation Of the Wo 3 Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%