2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9dt04693c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural evolution of the Ru-bms complex to the real water oxidation catalyst of Ru-bda: the bite angle matters

Abstract: The bite angle matters: Opening up the O–Ru–O angle of Ru complexes enables water oxidation catalysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[125,126] Such type of decomposition is also reported in other molecular complexes which are reinvestigated [126,127] or they have been reported for the first time with different types of a molecular catalyst such as Ni [128,129], Mn [130], and Co [128,131]. The investigation of different Ru based WOCs [97,98] together with the similar structures of WOCs which are stable [116,132,133] versus unstable [39,99,128] ones, guide us that the most possible source of CO2 release during O2 gas detection comes from the oxidation of methylene groups in ligand backbone. [127,134] Arguably, we suggest a rational modification by replacing hydrogen atoms in the methylene groups in the ligand backbone with methyl groups (Figure 20b).…”
Section: Evolution Of Ru(n)4(o)2 Wocsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…[125,126] Such type of decomposition is also reported in other molecular complexes which are reinvestigated [126,127] or they have been reported for the first time with different types of a molecular catalyst such as Ni [128,129], Mn [130], and Co [128,131]. The investigation of different Ru based WOCs [97,98] together with the similar structures of WOCs which are stable [116,132,133] versus unstable [39,99,128] ones, guide us that the most possible source of CO2 release during O2 gas detection comes from the oxidation of methylene groups in ligand backbone. [127,134] Arguably, we suggest a rational modification by replacing hydrogen atoms in the methylene groups in the ligand backbone with methyl groups (Figure 20b).…”
Section: Evolution Of Ru(n)4(o)2 Wocsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…By introducing a methylene group to catalyst 4, the O−Ru−O angle of catalyst 18 is reduced to 84°, approaching the ideal octahedral configuration. 56 Although sulfonate has a weak coordinating ability, its nondistorted conformation makes ligand exchange challenging. Additionally, due to the nonoxidatively rugged nature of the methylene group, various other active species evolve during the turnover, with Ru-bda being one of them.…”
Section: Equatorial Ligandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we would like to emphasize the impact of changes in coordination angle and coordination atom type on catalysis. By introducing a methylene group to catalyst 4 , the O–Ru–O angle of catalyst 18 is reduced to 84°, approaching the ideal octahedral configuration . Although sulfonate has a weak coordinating ability, its nondistorted conformation makes ligand exchange challenging.…”
Section: Impact Of Ligand Modificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the “blue dimer” of WOCs was first reported, numerous transition metal complexes based on Fe, Co, Ni, Mn, Cu, Ru, etc., with various ligands have been widely explored . Among them, Ru-based WOCs with various ligands, including polypyridine and its analogues, carboxylatopyridine, organo-phosphonato, and polyoxometalate, have been explored most extensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%