2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2018.0060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural features underlying recognition and translocation of extracellular polysaccharides

Abstract: Essentially all living systems produce complex carbohydrates as an energy source, structural component, protective coat or adhesive for cell attachment. Many polysaccharides are displayed on the cell surface or are threaded through proteinaceous tunnels for degradation. Dictated by their chemical composition and mode of polymerization, the physical properties of complex carbohydrates differ substantially, from amphipathic water-insoluble polymers to highly hydrated hydrogel-forming macromolecules. Accordingly,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We argue these structures were published with insufficient supporting evidence to justify the very high level of the publications, with their implicit authority, particularly given the uncertainty around the mechanistic interpretation of structural features. Perhaps more tellingly, however, these structures have been presented and discussed in a number subsequent reviews [1,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], essentially without reservation regarding their veracity, or caveats around the requirement for further independent support. We believe that all of this indicates a general level of certitude that the structures are unlikely to be incorrect, that is not warranted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We argue these structures were published with insufficient supporting evidence to justify the very high level of the publications, with their implicit authority, particularly given the uncertainty around the mechanistic interpretation of structural features. Perhaps more tellingly, however, these structures have been presented and discussed in a number subsequent reviews [1,[42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49], essentially without reservation regarding their veracity, or caveats around the requirement for further independent support. We believe that all of this indicates a general level of certitude that the structures are unlikely to be incorrect, that is not warranted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Translocation of the acceptor is carried out by three conserved features: a QxxRW motif, a finger helix with a TED motif, and a gating loop. The conserved QxxRW sequence is located near the channel’s entrance and is responsible for the stabilization of the acceptor through π and hydrogen bonds ( Morgan et al, 2016 ; Zimmer, 2019 ). Additionally, the finger helix’s TED motif interacts with the acceptor polysaccharide by forming hydrogen bonds with three hydroxyls of terminal Glc.…”
Section: Proteins Involved In Xyloglucan Biosynthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6b). Notably, this motif is rich in acidic/aromatic residues that are capable of forming H-bonds/"greasy slides" frequently found in protein-sugar interactions 44 .…”
Section: Identification Of the Gpi-binding Sitementioning
confidence: 99%