2006
DOI: 10.1306/04240605101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural geometry and evolution of the Ku, Zaap, and Maloob structures, Campeche Bay, Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In each of these methods using geological information, mathematical or statistical sciences and different software, properties of the reservoir are modeled. There are some publications in different aspects of the reservoir modeling such as dynamic reservoir simulations (Labourdette et al, 2006;Jackson et al, 2005), fracture intensity (Wong, 2003;Masaferro et al, 2003), 3D stratigraphy, 3D structural model (Mitra and Leslie, 2003;Mitra et al, 2006;Hennings et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each of these methods using geological information, mathematical or statistical sciences and different software, properties of the reservoir are modeled. There are some publications in different aspects of the reservoir modeling such as dynamic reservoir simulations (Labourdette et al, 2006;Jackson et al, 2005), fracture intensity (Wong, 2003;Masaferro et al, 2003), 3D stratigraphy, 3D structural model (Mitra and Leslie, 2003;Mitra et al, 2006;Hennings et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%