2015 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy, and Structural Monitoring Systems (EESMS) Proceedings 2015
DOI: 10.1109/eesms.2015.7175872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural health monitoring of a historic masonry tower

Abstract: The paper summarizes the results of the first 15 months of continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia tower in Mantua. After the Italian seismic events of May 2012 a wide investigation program was performed on the tower, suggesting the installation of a dynamic monitoring system in the upper region of the building. The continuously recorded signals allowed the automated identification of the natural frequencies of the key vibration modes of the structure and the clear detection of the effects of temperature o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and thus the j-th damped frequency of the structural system f j 1 − ζ 2 j can be estimated performing the mean of the instantaneous damped frequency in Equation (12). The damp-ing ratio can be calculated from the envelope; in fact, by performing the logarithm of Equation (10) it is possible to obtain the linear form [17,18] ln…”
Section: X(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and thus the j-th damped frequency of the structural system f j 1 − ζ 2 j can be estimated performing the mean of the instantaneous damped frequency in Equation (12). The damp-ing ratio can be calculated from the envelope; in fact, by performing the logarithm of Equation (10) it is possible to obtain the linear form [17,18] ln…”
Section: X(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMA methods require the knowledge of both structural excitation (input) and structural response (output), while OMA methods allow one to identify the dynamic properties of a system, assumed as linear and time-invariant [2], without knowledge of the structural excitation [3] that is due to ambient vibrations and usually modelled as a stationary [4] white noise [5]. OMA methods can be employed for different purposes such as model validation [6], calibration of Finite Elements Models (FEMs) [7], vibration control [8,9], Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) [10][11][12][13][14], damage detection [15], and structural identification [16][17][18]. Applications of OMA were conducted on bridges [19][20][21], historical buildings [17,22], dams [23], tall buildings [24,25], offshore platforms [26,27], and other kinds of structure [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introduction 1preliminaries and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since the structural input is due to the ambient vibrations (usually modelled as a white noise process [3][4][5]), OMA methods allow to identify the structural system when it is under operative conditions. This kind of methods have been used to identify structural systems [6][7][8], to perform structural health monitoring (SHM) [9][10][11][12][13], to calibrate finite elements models [14] and to detect structural damages [15,16]. OMA methods has been applied on historical buildings [7,17,18], tall buildings [19,20], bridges [21][22][23], masonry structures [24], dams [25], offshore platforms [26,27] and other structural systems [28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted ultrasonic sensor system can be classified into two major modules, namely, the hardware module and the software module. An ultrasonic sensor has two main parts, (a) the transmitter and (b) the receiver; the transmitter sends out a signal after it has been reflected off the surface or cracks [1,2]. The principle of the ultrasonic sensor emits short bursts of high-frequency sound at regular intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%