2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2003.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural identification of extractables from rubber closures used for pre-filled semisolid drug applicator by chromatography, mass spectrometry, and organic synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the 32 articles included in this meta-synthesis of E/L contamination, 18 identification studies and 14 quantification studies were flagged (Tables 1-2) [6,7,9,11,13,.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the 32 articles included in this meta-synthesis of E/L contamination, 18 identification studies and 14 quantification studies were flagged (Tables 1-2) [6,7,9,11,13,.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MS is frequently used for E/L analysis because it allows structural, qualitative, and quantitative analyses [12]. In fact, MS offers the possibility of identifying unknown compounds thanks to the existence of MS/MS spectral libraries [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 For example, refluxing with extraction solvents for 8 h was reported for extraction studies on rubber stoppers. 32,33 As demonstrated by different research groups, due to the variety of chemical species that can be extracted from a component, different analytical methods are required to obtain a complete extractable profile. 24,32,34 Typically, analytical methods such as GC-MS, Headspace (HS) GC-MS, LC-MS, NMR, and ICP-MS may be utilized to characterize leachables.…”
Section: Testing Of Extractablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 As demonstrated by different research groups, due to the variety of chemical species that can be extracted from a component, different analytical methods are required to obtain a complete extractable profile. 24,32,34 Typically, analytical methods such as GC-MS, Headspace (HS) GC-MS, LC-MS, NMR, and ICP-MS may be utilized to characterize leachables. An example of extractable assessment of bioprocess bags is shown in Table 2 where different solvents ranging from water to 10% (w/v) polysorbate were employed in the extraction study.…”
Section: Testing Of Extractablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of analytical methods have been reported in the literature to quantitate and characterize stopper extractables found in parenteral drug products. These include LC [12,[19][20][21]; LC-MS [20,22,23]; TLC [24]; GC-MS [19]; and atomic absorption spectroscopy [21]. The majority of these methods were applied to stopper ingredients extracted into aqueous product media and, therefore, not subject to matrix challenges posed by more complex formulations such as limitations to sensitivity and reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%