The structures of the cytoplasmic loops of the phototaxis receptor sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) and the membrane-proximal cytoplasmic domain of its bound transducer HtrII were examined in the dark and in the lightactivated state by fluorescent probes and cysteine crosslinking. Light decreased the accessibility of E-F loop position 154 in the SRII-HtrII complex, but not in free SRII, consistent with HtrII proximity, which was confirmed by tryptophans placed within a 5-residue region identified in the HtrII membrane-proximal domain that exhibited Fö rster resonance energy transfer to a fluorescent probe at position 154 in SRII. The Fö rster resonance energy transfer was eliminated in the signaling deficient HtrII mutant G83F without loss of affinity for SRII. Finally, the presence of SRII and HtrII reciprocally inhibit homodimer disulfide cross-linking reactions in their membrane-proximal domains, showing that each interferes with the others self-interaction in this region. The results demonstrate close proximity between SRII-HtrII in the membrane-proximal domain, and in addition, light stimulation of the SRII inhibition of HtrII cross-linking was observed, indicating that the contact is enhanced in the photoactivated complex. A mechanism is proposed in which photoactivation alters the SRII-HtrII interaction in the membrane-proximal region during the signal relay process.Archaeal sensory rhodopsins I and II (SRI and SRII) 1 are membrane-embedded phototaxis receptors that modulate the motility apparatus of Halobacterium salinarum and related haloarchaeal species (1-3). The SRI and SRII proteins transmit signals to their cognate transducer proteins, HtrI and HtrII, respectively, and like their eubacterial counterparts in chemotaxis, the Htr transducers control a histidine kinase and phosphoregulator protein that modulates motor function.Biochemical and spectroscopic studies have shown that there is close interaction between the SR and Htr components of the signaling complex both in the light and in the dark (1); i.e. they are subunits of a molecular complex. Furthermore, chimera experiments demonstrated that the interaction specificities of SRI with HtrI and SRII with HtrII are determined by the transmembrane helices of the Htr subunits (4). Cubic lipid phase crystal x-ray structures of SRII have defined the membrane-embedded and membrane-external portions of the transmembrane helices and periplasmic and cytoplasmic loops of the protein (5, 6). Moreover, co-crystallization of SRII with an N-terminal fragment of HtrII containing its two transmembrane segments (TM1 and TM2) and a cytoplasmic extension of TM2 provided an atomic resolution structure by x-ray diffraction (7). The structure resolved extensive van der Waals and hydrogen-bonding contacts between HtrII TM2 (and to a lesser extent TM1) and SRII helices F and G within the membrane domain. The presence of the cytoplasmic membrane-proximal domain, comprised of 32 residues beyond Leu-82 at the membrane-cytoplasm interface, was necessary for high affinity binding o...