2022
DOI: 10.1038/s42004-021-00623-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural insights into the potency and selectivity of covalent pan-FGFR inhibitors

Abstract: FIIN-2, TAS-120 (Futibatinib) and PRN1371 are highly potent pan-FGFR covalent inhibitors targeting the p-loop cysteine of FGFR proteins, of which TAS-120 and PRN1371 are currently in clinical trials. It is critical to analyze their target selectivity and their abilities to overcome gatekeeper mutations. In this study, we demonstrate that FIIN-2 and TAS-120 form covalent adducts with SRC, while PRN1371 does not. FIIN-2 and TAS-120 inhibit SRC and YES activities, while PRN1371 does not. Moreover, FIIN-2, TAS-120… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pemigatinib was redocked into FGFR1 to evaluate the reliability of this method. Then, pemigatinib was docked into FGFR2 (PDB ID: 6LVL) 28 , FGFR3 (PDB ID:7DHL) 29 and FGFR4 (PDB ID: 7F3M) 30 , respectively. Structural models predict that FGFR1-4 in complex with pemigatinib exhibit similar binding modes and similar interaction patterns (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pemigatinib was redocked into FGFR1 to evaluate the reliability of this method. Then, pemigatinib was docked into FGFR2 (PDB ID: 6LVL) 28 , FGFR3 (PDB ID:7DHL) 29 and FGFR4 (PDB ID: 7F3M) 30 , respectively. Structural models predict that FGFR1-4 in complex with pemigatinib exhibit similar binding modes and similar interaction patterns (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All FGFR4 constructs were prepared as previously described. ,, Briefly, the FGFR4 kinase domain (residues 445–753) was cloned into a modified pET28a vector with an N-terminal PreScission protease-cleavable 6xHis tag. The FGFR4 kinase domain (residues 442–802) with an N-terminal TEL (residues 1–183) was cloned into pMSCVpuro (Clontech).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All FGFR4 crystals were grown at 4 °C by hanging drop vapor diffusion with well solution (15–21% PEG-3350, 0.1 M Bis–Tris, pH 4.5, and 0.2 M Li 2 SO 4 ), then quickly transferred to mother liquor supplemented with 20% glycerol and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen. FGFR4/ 8k , FGFR4/ 8z , FGFR4 V550L / 8z , and FGFR4 V550M / 8z crystal data sets were collected at the BL19U136 beamlines of Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), while the FGFR4/ 8r crystal data set was collected using an in-house MicroMax-007 X-ray generator equipped with VariMax HR optics (Rigaku, Japan) and processed using the HKL3000. , All structures were solved by molecular replacement using PHENIX Phaser with FGFR4/ 10z (PDB ID: 7YBO) as the search model for FGFR4/ 8r and FGFR4/ 8z , FGFR4 V550L / 7v (PDB ID: 7WCW) for FGFR4 V550L / 8z , and FGFR4 V550M / 7v (PDB ID: 7WCX) for FGFR4 V550M / 8z . The ligands were modeled in PRODRG Web site and fitted by Phenix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All constructs were prepared as previously described. ,, Briefly, the FGFR4 kinase domain, containing an N-terminal 6xHis tag followed by a PreScission cleavage site, was cloned into pET28a vector. The N -terminal of TEL followed by FGFR4 kinase domain (TEL-FGFR4) constructs were cloned into pMSCVpuro (Clontech).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%