2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.12.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural, magnetic and Mossbauer studies of TI doped Gd2Fe17−xTix and Gd2Fe16Ga1−xTix (0≤x≤1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the higher Tc values of Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga 0.5 TM 0.5 as compared to that of pure Gd 2 Fe 17 could be attributed to this effect as well. In comparison to various doped intermetallic such as Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga (~410 K) [46], Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga 0.5 Ti 0.5 (556 K) [47], Dy 2 Fe 16 Ga (~462 K) [8], Ce 2 Fe 16 Ga (~320 K) [48], Sm 2 Fe 16 Ga (~505 K) [49], or Sm 2 Fe 16.2 Ti 0.8 (~435 K) [50], the reported compound Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga 0.5 TM 0.5 with Co, Ni, and Cu substitution certainly exhibits higher Tc and Ms, thus ensuring their potential use as high-temperature permanent magnet applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the higher Tc values of Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga 0.5 TM 0.5 as compared to that of pure Gd 2 Fe 17 could be attributed to this effect as well. In comparison to various doped intermetallic such as Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga (~410 K) [46], Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga 0.5 Ti 0.5 (556 K) [47], Dy 2 Fe 16 Ga (~462 K) [8], Ce 2 Fe 16 Ga (~320 K) [48], Sm 2 Fe 16 Ga (~505 K) [49], or Sm 2 Fe 16.2 Ti 0.8 (~435 K) [50], the reported compound Gd 2 Fe 16 Ga 0.5 TM 0.5 with Co, Ni, and Cu substitution certainly exhibits higher Tc and Ms, thus ensuring their potential use as high-temperature permanent magnet applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, observed higher Tc values of Gd2Fe16Ga0.5TM0.5 as compared to that of pure Gd2Fe17 could be attributed to this effect as well. In comparison to various doped intermetallics such as Gd2Fe16Ga (~410 K) [45], Gd2Fe16Ga0.5Ti0.5 (556 K) [46], Dy2Fe16Ga (~462K) [8], Ce2Fe16Ga (~320K) [47], Sm2Fe16Ga (~505K) [48], or Sm2Fe16.2Ti0.8 (~435K) [49], the reported compound The hyperfine parameters derived from the fitting are listed in Table V, and weighted average (Wt.Avg.) hyperfine field (HF) and isomer shifts (IS, ) are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, observed higher Tc values of Gd2Fe16Ga0.5TM0.5 as compared to that of pure Gd2Fe17 could be attributed to this effect as well. In comparison to various doped intermetallics such as Gd2Fe16Ga (~410 K) [45], Gd2Fe16Ga0.5Ti0.5 (556 K) [46], Dy2Fe16Ga (~462K) [8], Ce2Fe16Ga (~320K) [47], Sm2Fe16Ga (~505K) [48], or Sm2Fe16.2Ti0.8 (~435K) [49], the reported compound Gd2Fe16Ga0.5TM0.5 with Co, Ni, and Cu substitution certainly exhibits higher Tc and Ms, thus ensuring their potential use as high temperature permanent magnet applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this inequivalency demands further magnetic splitting of g, j, and k iron sites. Mössbauer studies of Gd2Fe16Ga0.5TM0.5 have been conducted accordingly, either with 8 or 10 magnetic sextets, with absence or presence of impurity phase, respectively[46,53,54,55]. The Mössbauer spectral analysis was carried out with magnetic sextets assigned to the 4f, 6g, 12j, and 12k sites in Gd2Fe17.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%