2017
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/26/10/106102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural modification in swift heavy ion irradiated muscovite mica

Abstract: Two-layer monoclinic (2M) muscovite mica sheets with a thickness of 12 µm are irradiated with Sn ions at room temperature with electronic energy loss (dE/dx) e of 14.7 keV/nm. The ion fluence is varied between 1×10 11 and 1×10 13 ions/cm 2 . Structural transition in irradiated mica is investigated by x-ray diffraction (XRD). The main diffraction peaks shift to the high angles, and the inter-planar distance decreases due to swift heavy ion (SHI) irradiation. Dehydration takes place in mica during SHI irradiatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the diffraction angle of the diffraction peak corresponding to kaolinite at 12.3 • increased, indicating that the distance between the layers of kaolinite decreased, which was mainly caused by the removal of intercalated water and of hydroxyl groups between layers [29]. The diffraction peak corresponding to the muscovite at 34.9 • disappeared, indicating that part of muscovite structures was destroyed [32]. Figure 5a-c, it can be seen that the microstructure of CGCB became denser and more compacted with the increase in GO content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the diffraction angle of the diffraction peak corresponding to kaolinite at 12.3 • increased, indicating that the distance between the layers of kaolinite decreased, which was mainly caused by the removal of intercalated water and of hydroxyl groups between layers [29]. The diffraction peak corresponding to the muscovite at 34.9 • disappeared, indicating that part of muscovite structures was destroyed [32]. Figure 5a-c, it can be seen that the microstructure of CGCB became denser and more compacted with the increase in GO content.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%