2019
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-019-0461-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Ni1−xZnxO/Ni nanocomposite

Abstract: Ni 1−x Zn x O/Ni nanocomposite samples synthesized by wet chemical method were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometer, UV-Vis spectrometer and Nine Tesla Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS)-based vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). XRD spectra contained peaks due to NiO and Ni. Rietveld refinement of XRD data indicated the change in lattice parameter is more than twice in NiO than in Ni suggests that Zn goes more favorably into NiO than in Ni. The ban… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, hν represents the photon energy, and B is a constant parameter specific to the material. The linear behavior observed in the plot of (αhν) 2 versus hν (figure 5) suggests that the synthesized NCs obey the characteristics of direct E g semiconductors [32]. The specific direct E g values (table 3) for the NCs are determined by extending the linear portion of the (αhν) 2 versus hν plot to α = 0.…”
Section: Uv-visible Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Here, hν represents the photon energy, and B is a constant parameter specific to the material. The linear behavior observed in the plot of (αhν) 2 versus hν (figure 5) suggests that the synthesized NCs obey the characteristics of direct E g semiconductors [32]. The specific direct E g values (table 3) for the NCs are determined by extending the linear portion of the (αhν) 2 versus hν plot to α = 0.…”
Section: Uv-visible Analysismentioning
confidence: 86%
“…UV-Visible analysis was conducted to explore the influence of different annealing durations on the E g of the prepared NCs. The value of direct E g of the NCs were determined using Tauc's plot [32,45] methodology from…”
Section: Uv-visible Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, on the transmission spectra, Kubelka-Munk equation was employed to calculate the band gap as: F(R)=α/s=(1 − R) 2 /2R; the terms in the above equation like F(R), α, s and R denote the Kubelka-Munk function, absorption coefficient, scattering factor, and reflectance of the as-synthesized SnO 2 and Sr-doped SnO 2 nanostructures, respectively. An intercept of the Taucs plot between αhυ 2 on y-axis and hυ on x-axis as shown in figure 9 provides the values of the band gap of as-synthesized materials [43][44][45]. The band gap values were found to be 3.56 eV, 3.54 eV, 3.12 eV and 3.03 eV for pure SnO 2 , 1%, 2.5% and 5% Srdoped SnO 2 nanoparticles, respectively.…”
Section: Uv-visible Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further increase in concentration of Zn NO H O . Tauc and Davis-Mott relation [42] as given in equation (6) below is used to calculate the bandgap of as obtained samples which are shown in table 3.…”
Section: Uv-vis Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 99%