Engineering Mechanics 2020 2020
DOI: 10.21495/5896-3-448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Optimization of Aerofoils for Many Criteria

Abstract: In this paper a problem of structural optimization of an aerofoil is examined. Authors' implementation of a multiobjective optimization algorithm based on differential evolution and elements of game theory is used as an optimization tool. Real requirements asked of aerofoil systems, described by mathematical functions are used as optimization objectives. Values of these functionals are determined numerically multiple times during the course of optimization. On the basis of a wing of unmanned aerial vehicle (UA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for multi-objective optimization, multiple and potentially conflicting objectives must be considered simultaneously to determine the optimal answer in the solution set [56,57]. If the designer has a quantitative ranking of the objectives, these objectives can be combined together to formulate a single objective problem, but when no such ranking exists, constructing a Pareto front is the most common methodology [58][59][60], which is applicable to real-world problems such as the design of architected materials [61,62], turbo-machinery [63][64][65][66][67], process-engineering [68][69][70], shape design [71][72][73], and structural engineering [74,75] when multiple objectives that cannot be quantitatively ranked are involved.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for multi-objective optimization, multiple and potentially conflicting objectives must be considered simultaneously to determine the optimal answer in the solution set [56,57]. If the designer has a quantitative ranking of the objectives, these objectives can be combined together to formulate a single objective problem, but when no such ranking exists, constructing a Pareto front is the most common methodology [58][59][60], which is applicable to real-world problems such as the design of architected materials [61,62], turbo-machinery [63][64][65][66][67], process-engineering [68][69][70], shape design [71][72][73], and structural engineering [74,75] when multiple objectives that cannot be quantitatively ranked are involved.…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%