2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.245406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural properties of the graphene-SiC(0001) interface as a key for the preparation of homogeneous large-terrace graphene surfaces

Abstract: We report on the interface between graphene and 4H-SiC͑0001͒ as investigated by scanning tunneling microscopy ͑STM͒ and low energy electron diffraction ͑LEED͒. It is characterized by the so-called ͑6 ͱ 3 ϫ 6 ͱ 3͒R30°reconstruction, whose structural properties are still controversially discussed but at the same time are crucial for the controlled growth of homogeneous high-quality large-terrace graphene surfaces. We discuss the role of three observed phases with periodicities ͑6 ͱ 3 ϫ 6 ͱ 3͒R30°, ͑6 ϫ 6͒, and ͑… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
429
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(470 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
40
429
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2,23 Figure 1b is the STM image of a boundary between monolayer (ML) and bilayer (BL) graphene, clearly showing moiré pattern and atomic lattice of graphene with a background due to the   30 ) 3 6 3 6 ( R reconstructed buffer layer. 24 The BL graphene appears much smoother than the ML. Because the graphene layer is formed through the graphitization of SiC (0001), a ML-BL boundary almost always coincides with an underlying substrate step.…”
Section: Graphene Domain Boundaries On Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,23 Figure 1b is the STM image of a boundary between monolayer (ML) and bilayer (BL) graphene, clearly showing moiré pattern and atomic lattice of graphene with a background due to the   30 ) 3 6 3 6 ( R reconstructed buffer layer. 24 The BL graphene appears much smoother than the ML. Because the graphene layer is formed through the graphitization of SiC (0001), a ML-BL boundary almost always coincides with an underlying substrate step.…”
Section: Graphene Domain Boundaries On Sicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of EG was confi rmed by in situ low energy electron diffraction (LEED), STM, and photoemission spectroscopy (PES) [76]. Since the characteristic STM images of carbon nanomesh and single layer graphene are quite different, the appearance of single layer EG can be detected by monitoring the phase evolution from carbon nanomesh to graphene by in situ STM during the thermal annealing of SiC [76,79]. However, the STM images for single layer and bilayer EG on SiC are very similar.…”
Section: Nano Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[56][57][58] It can be decoupled to form a quasi-freestanding bilayer graphene (QFS-bilayer) through hydrogen atoms intercalation. 59 The intercalating atoms diffuse underneath the buffer layer and bound themselves to the topmost Si atoms of the SiC substrate converting the buffer layer to a mostly sp2-hybridized monolayer graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%