2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Rationale for the Coupled Binding and Unfolding of the c-Myc Oncoprotein by Small Molecules

Abstract: The basic-helix-loop-helix-leucine-zipper domains of the c-Myc oncoprotein and its obligate partner Max are intrinsically disordered (ID) monomers that undergo coupled folding and binding upon heterodimerization. We have identified the binding sites and determined the structural means by which two unrelated small molecules, 10058-F4 and 10074-G5, bind c-Myc and stabilize the ID monomer over the highly ordered c-Myc-Max heterodimer. In solution, the molecules bind to distinct regions of c-Myc and thus limit its… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
244
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(267 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
21
244
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, we have shown that doxorubicin could bind to the C-terminal half of unphosphorylated form of Nopp140 with apparent K D of 4.5 × 10 −6 M, 14 and lowered its level of CK2-dependent phosphorylation of Nopp140. 9 The interaction between IUPs and small molecules that bind to IUP had also been reported by Follis et al 42 The intrinsically disordered regions of cMyc and Max interacted with each other forming a helical heterodimer. Small molecules that interrupted this interaction 43 were shown to interact with the intrinsically disordered region of c-Myc and induced helical conformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previously, we have shown that doxorubicin could bind to the C-terminal half of unphosphorylated form of Nopp140 with apparent K D of 4.5 × 10 −6 M, 14 and lowered its level of CK2-dependent phosphorylation of Nopp140. 9 The interaction between IUPs and small molecules that bind to IUP had also been reported by Follis et al 42 The intrinsically disordered regions of cMyc and Max interacted with each other forming a helical heterodimer. Small molecules that interrupted this interaction 43 were shown to interact with the intrinsically disordered region of c-Myc and induced helical conformation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[18][19][20] The order-disordered transitions suffered by IDPs can be produced by several factors such as exogenous perturbations (for instance pH, [21][22][23]22,[24][25][26] or macromolecular crowding) 23,[27][28][29][30] or binding (multiple) diverse molecular entities, such as proteins 18,31,32 or small molecules. 10,[33][34][35] As they are very promiscuous molecules, IDPs can bind multiple partners. 14 The conformational flexibility showed by IDPs is key to understand their behavior.…”
Section: Intrinsically Disordered Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or binding (multiple) diverse molecular entities, such as proteins [18,31,32]. or small molecules [10,[33][34][35]. As they are very promiscuous molecules, IDPs can bind multiple partners [14].…”
Section: Intrinsically Disordered Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%