1999
DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3011.1999.00080.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural recognition of an ICAM‐1 peptide by its receptor on the surface of T cells: conformational studies of cyclo (1, 12)‐Pen‐Pro‐Arg‐Gly‐Gly‐Ser‐Val‐Leu‐Val‐Thr‐Gly‐Cys‐OH

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to elucidate the solution conformation of cyclic peptide 1 (cIBR), cyclo (1, 12)-Pen1-Pro2-Arg3-Gly4-Gly5-Ser6-Val7-Leu8-V al9-Thr10-Gly11-Cys12-OH, using NMR, circular dichroism (CD) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation experiments. cIBR peptide (1), which is derived from the sequence of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1, CD54), inhibits homotypic T-cell adhesion in vitro. The peptide hinders T-cell adhesion by inhibiting the leukocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of conjugate frequency by the cyclic peptides in the absence of a reduction in VS assembly implies that the peptides may simply be reducing the stability of cell-cell adhesion without inducing or altering adhesion molecule-mediated signaling to the VS. A second, nonexclusive explanation is that LFA-1-ICAM-3 interactions are more important than LFA-1-ICAM-1 interactions in conjugate and VS formation when CXCRX4-tropic viruses infect naïve or resting CD4 ϩ CXCR4 ϩ T cells and that the peptides more effectively inhibit the binding of LFA-1 to ICAM-1 than to ICAM-3. Since the cIBR peptide sequence is derived from the ICAM-1 D1 domain (14), it is unlikely to inhibit LFA-1-ICAM-3 binding as efficiently as LFA-1-ICAM-1 binding, especially given the fact that a much larger region of the ICAM-3 D1 domain contributes to LFA-1 association (2). Furthermore, the cLAB.L peptide is derived from the LFA-1 I domain and has been reported to bind less well to ICAM-3 than to ICAM-1 (35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduction of conjugate frequency by the cyclic peptides in the absence of a reduction in VS assembly implies that the peptides may simply be reducing the stability of cell-cell adhesion without inducing or altering adhesion molecule-mediated signaling to the VS. A second, nonexclusive explanation is that LFA-1-ICAM-3 interactions are more important than LFA-1-ICAM-1 interactions in conjugate and VS formation when CXCRX4-tropic viruses infect naïve or resting CD4 ϩ CXCR4 ϩ T cells and that the peptides more effectively inhibit the binding of LFA-1 to ICAM-1 than to ICAM-3. Since the cIBR peptide sequence is derived from the ICAM-1 D1 domain (14), it is unlikely to inhibit LFA-1-ICAM-3 binding as efficiently as LFA-1-ICAM-1 binding, especially given the fact that a much larger region of the ICAM-3 D1 domain contributes to LFA-1 association (2). Furthermore, the cLAB.L peptide is derived from the LFA-1 I domain and has been reported to bind less well to ICAM-3 than to ICAM-1 (35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other MAbs increased the frequency of conjugate formation (BT-1, MHM23) while reducing that of VS formation (MHM23). To further exclude nonspecific inhibition of conjugate and VS formation by MAbs, we tested cyclic peptides designed to inhibit LFA-1-ICAM interactions (14,35) for their effects on these processes. Target CD4 ϩ T cells were preincubated with the cIBR or cLAB.L peptide at 37°C, mixed with effector cells, incubated for 1 h, fixed, and processed for LSCM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25,26] and the NMR structure of cIBR peptide (magenta) [30]. The cIBL, cIBC, and cIBR peptides are located along the face of the A, A' and B strands on D1 of ICAM-1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the cIBR and cIBC peptides have an overlapping Pro-Arg-Gly-Gly (PRGG) sequence with a β-turn structure [30,31]. This epitope has a similar β-turn conformation in the X-ray structure of D1 of ICAM-1 ( Figure 5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of cIBR was determined by NMR spectroscopy in aqueous solution (Gursoy et al, 1999). The resonances were assigned using conventional through-bond (J-mediated) 2D-1H NMR spectra and inter-residue correlations from NOESY type experiments which were also used to obtain distance based constraints.…”
Section: Peptidesmentioning
confidence: 99%