2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural relationships of a firm's green strategies for environmental performance: The roles of green supply chain management and green marketing innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
71
0
5

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
4
71
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the insufficient financial market system and information asymmetry, bank credit primarily favors higher-paying applied research projects, while some high-risk basic research projects are difficult to finance (Kou et al, 2020 ; Cao et al, 2021 ). Government support for science and technology strengthens firms' capacity for innovation, acts as a “signaling” mechanism, broadens firms' funding sources, and reduces the cost of financing R&D projects, all of which increases the likelihood that some creative SMEs will be able to secure credit financing (Galbreath et al, 2021 ; Prokop et al, 2022 ; Roh et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, government funding for specific innovation projects may indicate to society the future demand for goods produced by the public sector (Lybæk et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the insufficient financial market system and information asymmetry, bank credit primarily favors higher-paying applied research projects, while some high-risk basic research projects are difficult to finance (Kou et al, 2020 ; Cao et al, 2021 ). Government support for science and technology strengthens firms' capacity for innovation, acts as a “signaling” mechanism, broadens firms' funding sources, and reduces the cost of financing R&D projects, all of which increases the likelihood that some creative SMEs will be able to secure credit financing (Galbreath et al, 2021 ; Prokop et al, 2022 ; Roh et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, government funding for specific innovation projects may indicate to society the future demand for goods produced by the public sector (Lybæk et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Burki (2018) and Chiou et al (2011) green supply chain management (GSCM) is one solution to reduce environmental damage caused by development or business processes which are not environmentally friendly. According to Roh et al (2022) and Silva et al (2019), GSCM is defined as a strategic capability that includes strategies, implementations, and policies that focus on managing the environmental impacts of supply chain activities. This definition indirectly includes an ecosystem philosophy of reducing externalities (waste and pollution) and material recovery while still focusing on the economic benefits of environmental responsibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the consideration of ecology has emerged as a new concept of business and personal philosophy, which gives pass to green marketing and sales (Aitken et al, 2020;Castellano et al, 2015;Fraj et al, 2011;Gao et al, 2022;Hernández & Danny, 2012;Heydari et al, 2022;Monteiro et al, 2015;Oliveira Duarte et al, 2022;Roh et al, 2022;Shi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%