2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.01.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural relaxation in the glass: Evidence for a path dependence of the relaxation time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as shown in Table 3, the TNM model parameters obtained from fitting the three sets of data are quantitatively different, and for one data set, x decreases for the stacked ultrathin films, whereas for the other sets, it increases relative to the bulk value. In fact, the TNM model has documented shortcomings, including the inability to describe multiple data sets and to capture thermal history with one set of parameters, the lack of physical meaning of x, and a mutual dependence of b 24,47,48,[59][60][61] Nevertheless, the nonexponentiality parameter b for all three sets of data is lower for the stacked ultrathin films, which indicates that an increased distribution of relaxation times and a broadening of the glass transition is a distinct characteristic of nanoconfinement. Our stacked ultrathin film sample also shows a lower value of the fragility index (i.e., it is a stronger glass former as shown in Table 2) than the bulk despite its lower value of b (i.e., increased heterogeneity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as shown in Table 3, the TNM model parameters obtained from fitting the three sets of data are quantitatively different, and for one data set, x decreases for the stacked ultrathin films, whereas for the other sets, it increases relative to the bulk value. In fact, the TNM model has documented shortcomings, including the inability to describe multiple data sets and to capture thermal history with one set of parameters, the lack of physical meaning of x, and a mutual dependence of b 24,47,48,[59][60][61] Nevertheless, the nonexponentiality parameter b for all three sets of data is lower for the stacked ultrathin films, which indicates that an increased distribution of relaxation times and a broadening of the glass transition is a distinct characteristic of nanoconfinement. Our stacked ultrathin film sample also shows a lower value of the fragility index (i.e., it is a stronger glass former as shown in Table 2) than the bulk despite its lower value of b (i.e., increased heterogeneity).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This same Dylene 8 polystyrene has been used in a handful of studies in our laboratory, in the laboratory of Prof. D. J. Plazek, and in collaborative studies. [16][17][18][19][20] A custom-built piston-type pressurizable dilatometer was used for measurements reported in this study. In this instrument, the polystyrene sample is surrounded by $ 5 g of fluorinated synthetic oil (Krytox 1 GPL107 from DuPont TM ) as confining fluid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 The TNM and similar phenomenological models have had broad success in describing many aspects of structural relaxation in amorphous materials, although their inadequacies have also been well documented. 40,41,51,[55][56][57][58] In the case of the XPCS experiments performed here, the failure of the TNM model is essentially due to the basic assumption that τ depends on the instantaneous state of the material via Tf. This is an over-simplification as it considers that a given glassy configuration can be defined by a single parameter like Tf or some macroscopic variable like specific volume or enthalpy and does not explicitly incorporate any microscopic details of the system under investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%