“…However, as shown in Table 3, the TNM model parameters obtained from fitting the three sets of data are quantitatively different, and for one data set, x decreases for the stacked ultrathin films, whereas for the other sets, it increases relative to the bulk value. In fact, the TNM model has documented shortcomings, including the inability to describe multiple data sets and to capture thermal history with one set of parameters, the lack of physical meaning of x, and a mutual dependence of b 24,47,48,[59][60][61] Nevertheless, the nonexponentiality parameter b for all three sets of data is lower for the stacked ultrathin films, which indicates that an increased distribution of relaxation times and a broadening of the glass transition is a distinct characteristic of nanoconfinement. Our stacked ultrathin film sample also shows a lower value of the fragility index (i.e., it is a stronger glass former as shown in Table 2) than the bulk despite its lower value of b (i.e., increased heterogeneity).…”