2005
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m411251200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Requirements of the Extracellular to Transmembrane Domain Junction for Erythropoietin Receptor Function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
35
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results differ in many respects from those of Kubatzky et al (28), who also performed cysteine-scanning mutagenesis to study the dimerization interface of the EpoR juxtamembrane and transmembrane domains, and identified the same three constitutively active mutants L223C, L226C, and I227C. Using selected lines of infected Ba/F3 cells they found that these mutants all grow at the same high rate in the absence of Epo (28). Our studies employed unselected populations of EpoR-expressing cells to eliminate bias in clonal selection, and we demonstrated significant differences in the ability of these activating mutants to mediate cytokine-independent growth even though they all expressed the same number of cell surface EpoRs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results differ in many respects from those of Kubatzky et al (28), who also performed cysteine-scanning mutagenesis to study the dimerization interface of the EpoR juxtamembrane and transmembrane domains, and identified the same three constitutively active mutants L223C, L226C, and I227C. Using selected lines of infected Ba/F3 cells they found that these mutants all grow at the same high rate in the absence of Epo (28). Our studies employed unselected populations of EpoR-expressing cells to eliminate bias in clonal selection, and we demonstrated significant differences in the ability of these activating mutants to mediate cytokine-independent growth even though they all expressed the same number of cell surface EpoRs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…These subtle differences in the biological activities of the various EpoR mutants, unnoticed in Ref. 28, suggest these mutants assume distinct activated conformations. Further structural analysis of synthetic EpoR transmembrane domains bearing these mutations will provide crucial structural details relevant to the optimal receptor conformation for activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…5A, SI Methods, and SI Table 1). It is worth noting that Ba/F3 cells expressing the chimeric EPO-Rs maintained their ability to proliferate when EPO was the sole added growth factor (data not shown), suggesting that the chimeras meet basic structural requirements for ligand activation (36). EPO activation of these cells resulted in Tyr phosphorylation of both EPO-R and STAT5, indicating the functionality of these EPO-Rs (SI Fig.…”
Section: Extracellular Segments Of Sepo-r Confer Enhanced Maturationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[3][4][5] The creation of disulfide bonds is critical for the activation of the receptors because elimination of the cysteines abrogated the cytokine independent growth. 4,6,7 Here we report and analyze a novel class of noncysteine mutations in cytokine type I receptors in ALL leading to ligand independent activation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%