2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Similarities between Brain and Linguistic Data Provide Evidence of Semantic Relations in the Brain

Abstract: This paper presents a new method of analysis by which structural similarities between brain data and linguistic data can be assessed at the semantic level. It shows how to measure the strength of these structural similarities and so determine the relatively better fit of the brain data with one semantic model over another. The first model is derived from WordNet, a lexical database of English compiled by language experts. The second is given by the corpus-based statistical technique of latent semantic analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taxonomic models. WordNet is the most influential representational model based on taxonomic information, having been used in several neuroimaging studies to successfully model semantic content (2,22,54,55). It is organized as a knowledge graph in which words are grouped into sets of synonyms ("synsets"), each expressing a distinct concept.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taxonomic models. WordNet is the most influential representational model based on taxonomic information, having been used in several neuroimaging studies to successfully model semantic content (2,22,54,55). It is organized as a knowledge graph in which words are grouped into sets of synonyms ("synsets"), each expressing a distinct concept.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether, and to what extent, each of these types of information plays a role in the neural representation of conceptual knowledge is a topic of intense research and debate. A large body of evidence has emerged from behavioral studies, functional neuroimaging experiments, and neuropsychological assessment of patients with semantic deficits, with results typically interpreted in terms of taxonomic (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24), experiential (13,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34), or distributional (2,3,5,35,36) accounts. However, the extent to which each of these representational systems plays a role in the neural representation of conceptual knowledge remains controversial (23,37,38), in part because their representations of common lexical concepts are strongly inter-correlated: patterns of word co-occurrence in natural language are driven in part by taxonomic and experiential similarities between the concepts to which they refer, and the taxonomy of natural categories is systematically related to the experiential attributes of the exemplars (39)(40)(41).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether, and to what extent, each of these types of information plays a role in the neural representation of conceptual knowledge is a topic of intense research and debate. A large body of evidence has emerged from behavioral studies, functional neuroimaging experiments, and neuropsychological assessments of patients with semantic deficits, with results typically interpreted in terms of taxonomic ( 19 24 ), experiential ( 13 , 25 34 ), or distributional ( 2 , 3 , 5 , 35 , 36 ) accounts. However, the extent to which each of these representational systems plays a role in the neural representation of conceptual knowledge remains controversial ( 23 , 37 , 38 ), in part, because their representations of common lexical concepts are strongly intercorrelated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We end with a brief discussion of what these methods offer. Quantitative text analysis has been used to do text data mining in the scientific literature ( Crangle et al, 2007 ) and detect patterns in language for studies of the brain ( Crangle, Perreau-Guimaraes & Suppes, 2013 ; Crangle, 2014 ). An alternative to qualitative methods such as those described in Barney, Griffiths & Banfield (2011) and Griffiths & Crisp (2012) , quantitative methods applied to language also allow common themes to be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%