2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118631201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural Steel Design to Eurocode 3 and AISC Specifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because EOB models that include both spin and tidal interactions are still in progress [93,94], our surrogate leaves out spin parameters. Once these models are available, adding the two spin magnitudes |S 1 | and |S 2 | for aligned spin systems for a total of five parameters will likely be straightforward using a standard grid-based interpolation scheme.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because EOB models that include both spin and tidal interactions are still in progress [93,94], our surrogate leaves out spin parameters. Once these models are available, adding the two spin magnitudes |S 1 | and |S 2 | for aligned spin systems for a total of five parameters will likely be straightforward using a standard grid-based interpolation scheme.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Type 1 failure mode is characterized by the formation of four plastic hinges in the T-stub flanges, two of which are on the sections over the inner edge of the inserted plates, while the other two are located at the sections corresponding to the flange-to-web connections, as shown in Figure 2a. This occurs when the strength of the T-stub is weaker and the strength of two bolts is stronger, which is partially similar to the Type 1 failure mode of traditional T-stub connections under tension [27,28]. By contrast, when the T-stub strength is greater than that of two bolts, the Type 2 failure mode appears, which is represented by the formation of two plastic hinges located at the sections corresponding to the flange-to-web connection, as well as the two bolts (see Figure 2b).…”
Section: Mechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Firstly, the stiffness of the T-stub connection is determined by following the approach of an equivalent cantilever model in [25]. Secondly, the tensile bearing capacity of the T-stub connection with inserted plates is assumed to be similar to that of a conventional T-stub connection without inserted plates, so the mechanical model tension can be directly drawn upon traditional T-stub connections from previous studies [26,27]. Hence, this paper is primarily concerned with the compressive bearing capacity of the mechanical model.…”
Section: Mechanical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equilibrium equation (4) and the governing equation (5) are replaced by: Substitution of the displacement (6) and the imperfection (11) into (13) yields: (14) The governing equation remains linear, but is no longer homogeneous. Consider the special case n = 1 and define the sum t(x) of the imperfection g(x) and the displacement v(x).…”
Section: Behaviour Of Geometrically Imperfect Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%