A mucoidal strain of Rhodococcus rhodochrous was resistant to 10% (vol/vol) n-hexadecane, while its rough derivatives were sensitive. When the extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) produced by the mucoidal strain was added to cultures of the rough strains, the rough strains gained resistance to n-hexadecane. Thus, EPS confer tolerance to n-hexadecane in members of the genus Rhodococcus.The genus Rhodococcus is a group of bacteria that exhibit a diverse range of metabolic activities. Some rhodococci have the ability to degrade a variety of organic compounds, including man-made xenobiotic compounds such as polychlorinated biphenyls, while others are capable of degrading numerous aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons (4,6,17,18). We prepared the aromatic fraction (AF) of Arabian light crude oil by silica gel chromatography as indicated in Table 1 (SWYAF). None of the strains tested grow in SWY, but six strains exhibited significant growth in SWYAF. All six of these strains were mucoidal in colony morphotype (Table 1).Nineteen of the 75 strains tested showed spontaneous rough-smooth colony morphotype changes at high frequencies. Three of these strains, Rhodococcus rhodochrous ATCC 17041, ATCC 19140, and ATCC 19150, were selected, and mucoidal derivatives were obtained from the original strains. Subsequently, rough derivatives were obtained from the mucoidal variants. The mucoidal clones of R. rhodochrous ATCC 17041, ATCC 19140, and ATCC 19150 showed good growth on SWYAF, whereas the parental strains and the rough derivatives of the mucoidal variants showed no or poor growth on SWYAF.These data suggested that there was an association between mucoidal morphology and the ability to grow on the AF of the crude oil. To investigate further, we employed three colony morphology mutants, S-2, R-1, and R-2, derived from R. rhodochrous CF222 (11, 16). Mucoidal strain S-2 grew well on SWYAF, whereas rough strains R-1 and R-2 did not (Fig. 1A). Plasmid pK4I-7 transformed S-2 from mucoidal to rough colony morphology, and production of extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) was suppressed in the resulting rough transformants (7). Growth of these transformants was inhibited greatly in SWYAF, supporting the hypothesis that there is an association between mucoidal morphology and the ability to grow on the AF.Strains S-2, R-1, and R-2 grew on YG (1% [wt/vol] glucose and 1% [wt/vol] yeast extract dissolved in distilled water, pH 7.2). Mucoidal strain S-2 showed good growth on YG containing 1% (vol/vol) AF (YGAF), while growth of rough strain R-2 was greatly inhibited by the AF. Growth of rough strain R-1 was also inhibited by the AF but to a lesser extent (Fig. 1B). From these observations, we concluded that the rough strains could not grow on the AF because they are sensitive to it.To characterize the tolerance of Rhodococcus strains to various hydrocarbons, an organic solvent tolerance test was performed as described by Aono et al. (2), and the results are shown in Table 2. Mucoidal strain S-2 showed good growth on plates overlaid with n-d...