2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural transitions in TPGS micelles induced by trehalose as a model cryoprotectant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These arguments are well supported by the data on the cryoprotectant factor. 4,12 The values were found to be 0.8 and 0.91 for SL and SL-CHL liposomes, respectively, before the incorporation of sugars. Interestingly, it increased to 1 upon adding sugars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These arguments are well supported by the data on the cryoprotectant factor. 4,12 The values were found to be 0.8 and 0.91 for SL and SL-CHL liposomes, respectively, before the incorporation of sugars. Interestingly, it increased to 1 upon adding sugars.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…At higher concentrations, sugar dehydrates the membrane, probably by pulling water molecules toward itself. 12 This triggers interdigitation among phospholipid molecules, thus leading to minor changes in the structural parameters of vesicles. At a threshold concentration, a reduction in the lateral mobility of phospholipids leads to glassy state formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The process depends upon the type of additive and their concentration. Sugars, salts, and solvents have been shown to modulate the clouding through disruption of water structures or induction of growth of aggregates. , The difference in clouding between T1304 and T1307 can be clearly noticed. Given its high hydrophilicity (PEO: 70%), T1307 remained solubilized even at a higher temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strains preserved in the presence of trehalose demonstrated a consistent recovery time (days to fluoresce once rehydrated), with average recovery times between 2 and 4 days through 10 months of storage (Figure 3e). Beyond stabilizing cellular components, it is possible that trehalose may interact with F127‐BUM polymer architecture during freeze‐drying, as has been seen in the case of other micellular assemblies (Arya et al, 2022). These results directly contrast to those without an additive wherein the recovery time increased by 2–3 days at each storage timepoint tested (Figure 3b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%