2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural transmission at line junctions: a benchmarking exercise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A more general case is represented by interfaces forming junctions between plates of varying thickness and meeting at arbitrary angles. The transmission/reflection coefficients for a set of plates coupled at a common interface (such as depicted in figure 3) may be computed using the methods presented in Langley & Heron [35] and Craik et al [36]. In particular, we consider the connection between plates as line junctions, that is, the interior properties of the junction are not modelled and, the mass and moment of inertia are neglected.…”
Section: Elastic Waves In Coupled Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more general case is represented by interfaces forming junctions between plates of varying thickness and meeting at arbitrary angles. The transmission/reflection coefficients for a set of plates coupled at a common interface (such as depicted in figure 3) may be computed using the methods presented in Langley & Heron [35] and Craik et al [36]. In particular, we consider the connection between plates as line junctions, that is, the interior properties of the junction are not modelled and, the mass and moment of inertia are neglected.…”
Section: Elastic Waves In Coupled Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To find the transmission/reflection coefficients of a set of plates being coupled at a common interface (such as depicted in Fig. 3), we follow [11,12]. In particular, we consider the connection between plates as line junctions, that is, the interior properties of the junction are not modelled and the mass and moment of inertia are neglected.…”
Section: Interface Scattering Matrices For Plate Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Los modelos analíticos planteados son semejantes, pero su materialización en rutinas de cálculo en ordenadores puede dar lugar a diferentes resultados, ya sea por las características de dichas rutinas o por errores en su programación. La verificación de estas rutinas es difícil a partir de las gráficas publicadas en revistas, por lo que los grupos de investigación pueden intercambiar datos para verificar sus modelos e incluso establecer referencias formales para la verificación y validación de los modelos, como la descrita en (Craik et al 2004). Esta publicación incluye resultados de pérdida de transmisión, orientados al uso del SEA, para varios tipos de uniones de placas semi-infinitas, isótropas, delgadas y planas que soportan ondas de flexión, longitudinales y transversales en el plano.…”
Section: Caracterización De La Transmisión Indirecta Estructural O Pounclassified
“…También los modelos analíticos necesitan procedimientos de validación, tal y como se pone de manifiesto en (Craik et al 2004) El problema de la validación del software de simulación acústica fue puesto de manifiesto por Molares y Sobreira-Seoane (2008). En esta comunicación se propone un problema de referencia (benchmark), consistente en un casquete esférico vibrante sobre una esfera rígida, para medir la precisión y rendimiento de programas de simulación de campos sonoros.…”
Section: Verificación Y Validaciónunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation