Structural Vibration Control of NREL 5.0 MW FOWT Using Optimal-Based MR Tuned Vibration Absorber

Martynowicz, Paweł; Santos, Matilde

doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1253

Cited by 7 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the obtained results, the general conclusion regarding the TVA tuning frequency is consistent with the previous work [33], i.e., the TVA-TN solution is by far superior to the TVA-TLP one regarding tower deflection RMS/amplitude and TVA stroke values. Thus, only the TVA-TN case was selected for the more thorough analyses described below.…”

Section: Control Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

“…The values of the adopted simulation model parameters are given in Tables 3 and 4. The values of the m1, k1, and c1 parameters were calculated on the basis of the 1st bending mode modal properties of the NREL 5MW tower-nacelle structure regarded as an Euler-Bernoulli cantilever beam with a tip mass [5], assuming m1 to be the mass of the nacelle-rotor assembly enlarged by the 22.68% of the tower mass, based on the structural data given in [26][27][28]33]. The k2 and c2 values were selected using the Den Hartog principle [11] on the basis of the assumed tuning frequency and absorber mass m2 = 10 t. Tables 1 and 2 present the main particulars of the regarded FOWT structure.…”

Section: A Regarded Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…is the MR damper force as described in [18,33] with parameters tuned to the present application as given in Table 4; 𝑖 (𝑢) is the MR damper control current, 𝐹 (𝑢) is the…”

Section: Control Problem Formulation and Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…is the MR damper force as described in [18,33] with parameters tuned to the present application as given in Table 4; i mr (u) is the MR damper control current, F a (u) is the actuator force [21], F e (t) is the nacelle horizontal excitation force, and x 0 (t) is the TLP surge that is assumed to be independent of the wind turbine tower-nacelle system bending in this research, as the NREL 5.0MW 1st tower bending modal mass is small in relation to the TLP structural mass plus an added mass due to the outgoing waves created by the floater motion [34]. The force produced by the MR damper includes electric current i mr (u, t) dependent friction force, viscous damping and stiffness components with a scaling parameter ν.…”

Section: Control Problem Formulation and Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, this approach suffers from force actuator dynamics not being included in the LQR formulation (thus, the realised control output is not the same as the calculated one), while adding the stroke-limiting springs and dampers alters the TVA frequency at higher strokes. In [33], structural vibration control of an FOWT model with barge-type support is investigated. The system is equipped with MR-damper-based TVA located in the nacelle.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Comparison of Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Tower Deflection Mitigation Methods Using Nonlinear Optimal-Based Reduced-Stroke Tuned Vibration Absorber

Martynowicz,

Katsaounis,

Mavrakos

2024

Energies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tower fatigue and strength are crucial operational concerns of floating offshore wind turbines (FOWTs) due to the escalation of the vibration phenomena observed on these structures as compared to land-based ones. FOWT towers are excited by wave and wind polyperiodic disturbances yielding continual transient states of structural vibration that are challenging for vibration mitigation systems. Thus, the paper investigates a novel implementation of nonlinear optimal-based vibration control solutions for the full-scale, tension leg platform (TLP)-based, NREL 5MW wind turbine tower-nacelle model with a 10-ton tuned vibration absorber (TVA), equipped with a magnetorheological (MR) damper, located at the nacelle. The structure is subjected to excessive wave and wind excitations, considering floating platform motions derived from model experiments in a wave tank. The MR damper operates simultaneously with an electromagnetic force actuator (forming a hybrid TVA) or independently (a semiactive TVA). The study includes both actuators’ nonlinearities and dynamics, whereby the former are embedded in the Hamilton-principle-based nonlinear control solutions. The TVA is tuned either to the NREL 5MW tower-nacelle 1st bending mode frequency (TVA-TN) or to the TLP surge frequency (TVA-TLP). The optimal control task was redeveloped concerning the TVA stroke and transient vibration minimisation, including the implementation of the protected structure’s acceleration and relative displacement terms, as well as the nonzero velocity term in the quality index. The regarded model is embedded in a MATLAB/Simulink environment. On the basis of the obtained results, the TVA-TN solution is by far superior to the TVA-TLP one. All the regarded TVA-TN solutions provide a tower deflection safety factor of ca. 2, while reference systems without any vibration reduction solutions or with a passive TVA-TLP are at risk of tower structural failure as well as the hybrid TVA-TLP system. The obtained TVA stroke reductions of 25.7%/22.0% coincide with 3.6%/10.3% maximum tower deflection reductions for the semiactive/hybrid TVA-TN case (respectively) with regard to the previously developed approaches. Moreover, these reductions are obtained due to the sole control algorithm enhancement; thus, no additional resources are necessary, while this attainment is accompanied by a reduction in the required MR damper force. The lowest obtained TVA stroke amplitude of 1.66 m is guaranteed by the newly introduced semiactive control. Its hybrid equivalent ensures 8% lower primary structure deflection amplitude and reduced nacelle acceleration levels thanks to the utilisation of the force actuator of the relatively low power (ca. 6 kW); the trade-off is an increased TVA stroke amplitude of 2.19 m, which, however, is the lowest among all the tested hybrid solutions. The analysed reference passive TVA systems, along with a modified ground-hook hybrid solution, can hardly be implemented in the nacelle (especially along the demanding side–side direction). The latter, being the well-proven hybrid solution for steady-state tower deflection minimisation, yielded unsatisfactory results. The achievements of the study may be used for an effective design of a full-scale vibration reduction system for the TLP-based floating wind turbine structure.

show abstract

Section: Control Resultssupporting

confidence: 89%

Section: A Regarded Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…is the MR damper force as described in [18,33] with parameters tuned to the present application as given in Table 4; 𝑖 (𝑢) is the MR damper control current, 𝐹 (𝑢) is the…”

Section: Control Problem Formulation and Solutionmentioning

confidence: 99%