Structurally-Constrained Relationships between Cognitive States in the Human Brain

Abstract

The anatomical connectivity of the human brain supports diverse patterns of correlated neural activity that are thought to underlie cognitive function. In a manner sensitive to underlying structural brain architecture, we examine the extent to which such patterns of correlated activity systematically vary across cognitive states. Anatomical white matter connectivity is compared with functional correlations in neural activity measured via blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals. Functional connectivity is separately measured at rest, during an attention task, and during a memory task. We assess these structural and functional measures within previously-identified resting-state functional networks, denoted task-positive and task-negative networks, that have been independently shown to be strongly anticorrelated at rest but also involve regions of the brain that routinely increase and decrease in activity during task-driven processes. We find that the density of anatomical connections within and between task-positive and task-negative networks is differentially related to strong, task-dependent correlations in neural activity. The space mapped out by the observed structure-function relationships is used to define a quantitative measure of separation between resting, attention, and memory states. We find that the degree of separation between states is related to both general measures of behavioral performance and relative differences in task-specific measures of attention versus memory performance. These findings suggest that the observed separation between cognitive states reflects underlying organizational principles of human brain structure and function.

Driving the brain towards creativity and intelligence: A network control theory analysis

“…Following prior work (Bassett, Brown, Deshpande, Carlson, & Grafton, 2011; Gu et al, 2015; Hermundstad et al, 2013; Hermundstad et al, 2014), we connected nodes (brain regions) by the number of white matter streamlines identified by a commonly used deterministic tractography algorithm (Cieslak & Grafton, 2014). This procedure results in sparse, weighted, undirected structural brain networks for each participant.…”

Elucidating Neural Network Functional Connectivity Abnormalities in Bipolar Disorder: Toward a Harmonized Methodological Approach

“…(68)). Although the effects of task-related manipulations and spontaneous changes in connectivity during resting state may be different, the idea that functional connectivity can occupy different, context-dependent states is common to both.…”

A Network Neuroscience of Human Learning: Potential to Inform Quantitative Theories of Brain and Behavior

“…In this case, the network nodes still represent brain regions or voxels, but the network edges now represent the estimated strength of white matter tracts linking pairs of nodes [51,52]. These so-called ’structural brain networks’ then represent the pattern of white matter microstructure supporting both baseline function [51,53,54] and its adaptability in response to task demands [55]. …”