PsycEXTRA Dataset 1989
DOI: 10.1037/e496472006-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-Activity Relationships of MDMA-Like Substances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One difference is that rather than the stimulus effects of MDMA being enhanced by a hallucinogenic agent (Schechter, 1998a), the present investigation demonstrates that the stimulus effects of a hallucinogenic agent (i.e., DOM) were enhanced by MDMA. Furthermore, the Schechter study employed a strain of rat (Fawn-Hooded) different from that used here (Sprague-Dawley), and it has been demonstrated that MDMA-stimulus generalization occurs to LSD in serotonergically-dysfunctional Fawn-Hooded rats (Schechter, 1998b) but not in Sprague-Dawley rats (Nichols and Oberlender, 1989). Also, LSD is a potent, but non-selective serotonin receptor ligand with 5-HT 1A agonist action of its own (i.e., inhibition of cAMP accumulation) whereas, in contrast, DOM lacks significant 5-HT 1A receptor affinity and agonist action (Pauwels et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One difference is that rather than the stimulus effects of MDMA being enhanced by a hallucinogenic agent (Schechter, 1998a), the present investigation demonstrates that the stimulus effects of a hallucinogenic agent (i.e., DOM) were enhanced by MDMA. Furthermore, the Schechter study employed a strain of rat (Fawn-Hooded) different from that used here (Sprague-Dawley), and it has been demonstrated that MDMA-stimulus generalization occurs to LSD in serotonergically-dysfunctional Fawn-Hooded rats (Schechter, 1998b) but not in Sprague-Dawley rats (Nichols and Oberlender, 1989). Also, LSD is a potent, but non-selective serotonin receptor ligand with 5-HT 1A agonist action of its own (i.e., inhibition of cAMP accumulation) whereas, in contrast, DOM lacks significant 5-HT 1A receptor affinity and agonist action (Pauwels et al, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Previous studies have demonstrated that MDMA stimulus generalization occurs to (±)8-OH DPAT, and that (±)8-OH DPAT enhances the stimulus actions of DOM (Glennon, 1991; Glennon and Young, 2000). However, DOM and MDMA failed to substitute for one another in tests of stimulus generalization regardless of which was employed as training drug (Glennon et al, 1982, 1986; Glennon, 1989; Nichols and Oberlender, 1989). As shown in Figure 1, MDMA failed to substitute for a DOM stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MDMA does not substitute for the potent hallucinogen, DOM, in animals trained to discriminate DOM from saline (Glennon et al, 1982;Nichols et al, 1986). Thus, MDMA appears to have significant stimulant activity but little or no hallucinogenic activity (Gletmon, Yousif & Patrick, 1988;Nichols & Oberlender, 1989), at least at the doses tested. Since the MDMA cue can be partially blocked by the dopamine receptor antagotiist haloperidol (Schecter, 1989), it would seem that some of MDMA's discriminative stimulus effects are mediated by dopamine.…”
Section: Behavioral Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like methamphetamine, MDMA is a potent releaser of catecholamine neurotransmitters (i.e., epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine) via action at presynaptic reuptake sites. MDMA is also a potent releaser of pre-synaptic serotonin (De la Torre et al, 2004; Nichols & Oberlender 1989; 1990; Nichols, 1994). Like mescaline and other classic hallucinogens, the subjective effects of MDMA are also attenuated by the 5-HT2AR antagonist ketanserin (Liechti et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%