Peptide stability to proteases has
been a major requirement for
developing peptide therapeutics. This study investigates the effects
of peptide stability on antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity under
various conditions. For this purpose, two human cathelicidin-derived
peptides differing in stability to proteases were utilized. While
GF-17, a peptide derived from the major antimicrobial region of human
LL-37, can be rapidly cleaved by proteases, the engineered peptide
17BIPHE2 is resistant to multiple proteases. In the standard antimicrobial
susceptibility, killing kinetics, and membrane permeabilization assays
conducted in vitro using planktonic bacteria, these two peptides displayed
similar potency. The two peptides were also similarly active against
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) USA300 prior to biofilm formation. However, 17BIPHE2 was
superior to GF-17 in disrupting preformed biofilms probably due to
both enhanced stability and slightly higher DNA binding capacity.
In a wax moth model, 17BIPHE2 better protected insects from MRSA infection-caused
death than GF-17, consistent with the slower degradation of 17BIPHE2
than GF-17. Here, peptide antimicrobial activity was found to be critical
for in vivo efficacy. When incorporated in the nanofiber/microneedle
delivery device, GF-17 and 17BIPHE2 displayed a similar effect in
eliminating MRSA in murine chronic wounds, underscoring the advantage
of nanofibers in protecting the peptide from degradation. Since nanoformulation
can ease the requirement of peptide stability, it opens the door to
a direct use of natural peptides or their cocktails for antimicrobial
treatment, accelerating the search of effective antibiofilm peptides
to treat chronic wounds.