2002
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and dynamics of liquid water with different long‐range interaction truncation and temperature control methods in molecular dynamics simulations

Abstract: We have used molecular dynamics simulations to study the physical properties of modified TIP3P water model included in the CHARMM program, using four different methods-the Ewald summation technique, and three different spherical truncation methods-for the treatment of the long-range interactions. Both the structure and dynamics of the liquid water model were affected by the methods used to truncate the long-range interactions. For some of the methods artificial structuring of the model liquid was observed arou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
97
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our D Bulk , obtained from a MD simulation of bulk water at the same thermodynamic conditions, is 28% higher than that reported in the literature for SPC/E, 2.5 × 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 at 306 K and 0.998 g cm -3 , and 33% higher than the experimental diffusion coefficient of water, 2.4 × 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 at 300 K. 39 It is known that the system size, interaction truncations, and long-range interaction schemes (e.g., reaction field and Ewald sums) affect the structure and dynamics of simulated water. 40,49 For example, values as high as 4.4 × 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 have been reported for SPC/E water using the Ewald sum method. 50 Since the value reported by Berendsen et al 39 was obtained applying a spherical cutoff for long-range interactions in a smaller system than ours (216 SPC/E water molecules in Berendsen's work compared to 729 in our bulk simulations), where we use the Ewald summation, we deem it appropriate to attribute the discrepancy in D to differences in system size and method of truncation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our D Bulk , obtained from a MD simulation of bulk water at the same thermodynamic conditions, is 28% higher than that reported in the literature for SPC/E, 2.5 × 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 at 306 K and 0.998 g cm -3 , and 33% higher than the experimental diffusion coefficient of water, 2.4 × 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 at 300 K. 39 It is known that the system size, interaction truncations, and long-range interaction schemes (e.g., reaction field and Ewald sums) affect the structure and dynamics of simulated water. 40,49 For example, values as high as 4.4 × 10 -5 cm 2 s -1 have been reported for SPC/E water using the Ewald sum method. 50 Since the value reported by Berendsen et al 39 was obtained applying a spherical cutoff for long-range interactions in a smaller system than ours (216 SPC/E water molecules in Berendsen's work compared to 729 in our bulk simulations), where we use the Ewald summation, we deem it appropriate to attribute the discrepancy in D to differences in system size and method of truncation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…91 The diffusion constants for pure water by the Drude and SPC/E water models were close to the experimental value while additive TIP3P water model overestimated the values by a factor of two, as previously reported. 95 All models overestimate the diffusion constant for NMA, with the Drude FF producing the smallest difference. It should be noted that the system size correction for diffusion constant calculations suggested by Yeh et al 75 was adopted in the present study.…”
Section: Kirkwood-buff Solution Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The initial structure of the DNA double helix was built using the NAB package [67] with idealized B-DNA structure parameters. The simulation software was the Gromacs package [68,69] with the CHARMM27 force field [70,71] using the simple point charge model of water TIP3P [72][73][74]. The dimension of the cubic simulation cells was set to 90 Å.…”
Section: Atomistic Molecular Dynamics Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%